git/Documentation/gitcli.txt, branch v1.8.2.2

Merge branch 'gp/avoid-explicit-mention-of-dot-git-refs' into maint

2013-03-26T19:40:04Z

* gp/avoid-explicit-mention-of-dot-git-refs: Fix ".git/refs" stragglers

Fix ".git/refs" stragglers

2013-02-25T06:23:32Z

A couple of references still survive to .git/refs as a tree of all refs. Fix one in docs, one in a -h message, one in a -h message quoted in docs. Signed-off-by: Greg Price Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Documentation: the name of the system is 'Git', not 'git'

2013-02-01T21:53:33Z

Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

gitcli: parse-options lets you omit tail of long options

2012-10-05T03:30:27Z

Describe the behaviour, but do warn people against taking it too literally and expect an abbreviation valid today will stay valid forever. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'jc/maint-checkout-fileglob-doc' into maint-1.7.11

2012-09-15T03:45:03Z

* jc/maint-checkout-fileglob-doc: gitcli: contrast wildcard given to shell and to git gitcli: formatting fix Document file-glob for "git checkout -- '*.c'"

gitcli: contrast wildcard given to shell and to git

2012-09-10T19:59:36Z

People who are not used to working with shell may intellectually understand how the command line argument is massaged by the shell but still have a hard time visualizing the difference between letting the shell expand fileglobs and having Git see the fileglob to use as a pathspec. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

gitcli: formatting fix

2012-09-10T19:59:02Z

The paragraph to encourage use of "--" in scripts belongs to the bullet point that describes the behaviour for a command line without the explicit "--" disambiguation; it is not a supporting explanation for the entire bulletted list, and it is wrong to make it a separate paragraph outside the list. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

gitcli: describe abbreviation of long options

2012-08-17T06:16:28Z

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

docs: stop using asciidoc no-inline-literal

2012-04-26T20:19:06Z

In asciidoc 7, backticks like `foo` produced a typographic effect, but did not otherwise affect the syntax. In asciidoc 8, backticks introduce an "inline literal" inside which markup is not interpreted. To keep compatibility with existing documents, asciidoc 8 has a "no-inline-literal" attribute to keep the old behavior. We enabled this so that the documentation could be built on either version. It has been several years now, and asciidoc 7 is no longer in wide use. We can now decide whether or not we want inline literals on their own merits, which are: 1. The source is much easier to read when the literal contains punctuation. You can use `master~1` instead of `master{tilde}1`. 2. They are less error-prone. Because of point (1), we tend to make mistakes and forget the extra layer of quoting. This patch removes the no-inline-literal attribute from the Makefile and converts every use of backticks in the documentation to an inline literal (they must be cleaned up, or the example above would literally show "{tilde}" in the output). Problematic sites were found by grepping for '`.*[{\\]' and examined and fixed manually. The results were then verified by comparing the output of "html2text" on the set of generated html pages. Doing so revealed that in addition to making the source more readable, this patch fixes several formatting bugs: - HTML rendering used the ellipsis character instead of literal "..." in code examples (like "git log A...B") - some code examples used the right-arrow character instead of '->' because they failed to quote - api-config.txt did not quote tilde, and the resulting HTML contained a bogus snippet like: foo bar which caused some parsers to choke and omit whole sections of the page. - git-commit.txt confused ``foo`` (backticks inside a literal) with ``foo'' (matched double-quotes) - mentions of `A U Thor ` used to erroneously auto-generate a mailto footnote for author@example.com - the description of --word-diff=plain incorrectly showed the output as "[-removed-] and {added}", not "{+added+}". - using "prime" notation like: commit `C` and its replacement `C'` confused asciidoc into thinking that everything between the first backtick and the final apostrophe were meant to be inside matched quotes - asciidoc got confused by the escaping of some of our asterisks. In particular, `credential.\*` and `credential..\*` properly escaped the asterisk in the first case, but literally passed through the backslash in the second case. Signed-off-by: Jeff King Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

doc: drop author/documentation sections from most pages

2011-03-11T15:59:16Z

The point of these sections is generally to: 1. Give credit where it is due. 2. Give the reader an idea of where to ask questions or file bug reports. But they don't do a good job of either case. For (1), they are out of date and incomplete. A much more accurate answer can be gotten through shortlog or blame. For (2), the correct contact point is generally git@vger, and even if you wanted to cc the contact point, the out-of-date and incomplete fields mean you're likely sending to somebody useless. So let's drop the fields entirely from all manpages except git(1) itself. We already point people to the mailing list for bug reports there, and we can update the Authors section to give credit to the major contributors and point to shortlog and blame for more information. Each page has a "This is part of git" footer, so people can follow that to the main git manpage.