git/git-rebase--interactive.sh, branch v2.5.2

Merge branch 'js/rebase-i-clean-up-upon-continue-to-skip'

2015-07-13T21:00:25Z

Abandoning an already applied change in "git rebase -i" with "--continue" left CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and confused later steps. * js/rebase-i-clean-up-upon-continue-to-skip: rebase -i: do not leave a CHERRY_PICK_HEAD file behind t3404: demonstrate CHERRY_PICK_HEAD bug

rebase -i: do not leave a CHERRY_PICK_HEAD file behind

2015-06-29T20:12:43Z

When skipping commits whose changes were already applied via `git rebase --continue`, we need to clean up said file explicitly. The same is not true for `git rebase --skip` because that will execute `git reset --hard` as part of the "skip" handling in git-rebase.sh, even before git-rebase--interactive.sh is called. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'mm/rebase-i-post-rewrite-exec'

2015-06-01T19:45:20Z

"git rebase -i" fired post-rewrite hook when it shouldn't (namely, when it was told to stop sequencing with 'exec' insn). * mm/rebase-i-post-rewrite-exec: t5407: use <<- to align the expected output rebase -i: fix post-rewrite hook with failed exec command rebase -i: demonstrate incorrect behavior of post-rewrite

rebase -i: fix post-rewrite hook with failed exec command

2015-05-22T15:39:02Z

Usually, when 'git rebase' stops before completing the rebase, it is to give the user an opportunity to edit a commit (e.g. with the 'edit' command). In such cases, 'git rebase' leaves the sha1 of the commit being rewritten in "$state_dir"/stopped-sha, and subsequent 'git rebase --continue' will call the post-rewrite hook with this sha1 as argument to the post-rewrite hook. The case of 'git rebase' stopping because of a failed 'exec' command is different: it gives the opportunity to the user to examine or fix the failure, but does not stop saying "here's a commit to edit, use --continue when you're done". So, there's no reason to call the post-rewrite hook for 'exec' commands. If the user did rewrite the commit, it would be with 'git commit --amend' which already called the post-rewrite hook. Fix the behavior to leave no stopped-sha file in case of failed exec command, and teach 'git rebase --continue' to skip record_in_rewritten if no stopped-sha file is found. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'ph/rebase-i-redo'

2015-05-19T20:17:56Z

"git rebase -i" moved the "current" command from "todo" to "done" a bit too prematurely, losing a step when a "pick" did not even start. * ph/rebase-i-redo: rebase -i: redo tasks that die during cherry-pick

Merge branch 'nd/multiple-work-trees'

2015-05-11T21:23:39Z

A replacement for contrib/workdir/git-new-workdir that does not rely on symbolic links and make sharing of objects and refs safer by making the borrowee and borrowers aware of each other. * nd/multiple-work-trees: (41 commits) prune --worktrees: fix expire vs worktree existence condition t1501: fix test with split index t2026: fix broken &&-chain t2026 needs procondition SANITY git-checkout.txt: a note about multiple checkout support for submodules checkout: add --ignore-other-wortrees checkout: pass whole struct to parse_branchname_arg instead of individual flags git-common-dir: make "modules/" per-working-directory directory checkout: do not fail if target is an empty directory t2025: add a test to make sure grafts is working from a linked checkout checkout: don't require a work tree when checking out into a new one git_path(): keep "info/sparse-checkout" per work-tree count-objects: report unused files in $GIT_DIR/worktrees/... gc: support prune --worktrees gc: factor out gc.pruneexpire parsing code gc: style change -- no SP before closing parenthesis checkout: clean up half-prepared directories in --to mode checkout: reject if the branch is already checked out elsewhere prune: strategies for linked checkouts checkout: support checking out into a new working directory ...

rebase -i: redo tasks that die during cherry-pick

2015-04-29T15:49:22Z

When rebase--interactive processes a task, it removes the item from the todo list and appends it to another list of executed tasks. If a pick (this includes squash and fixup) fails before the index has recorded the changes, take the corresponding item and put it on the todo list again. Otherwise, the changes introduced by the scheduled commit would be lost. That kind of decision is possible since the cherry-pick command signals why it failed to apply the changes of the given commit. Either the changes are recorded in the index using a conflict (return value 1) and rebase does not continue until they are resolved or the changes are not recorded in the index (return value neither 0 nor 1) and rebase has to try again with the same task. Add a test cases for regression testing to the "rebase-interactive" test suite. Signed-off-by: Fabian Ruch Signed-off-by: Phil Hord Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'es/rebase-i-count-todo' into maint

2015-03-23T18:23:17Z

"git rebase -i" recently started to include the number of commits in the insn sheet to be processed, but on a platform that prepends leading whitespaces to "wc -l" output, the numbers are shown with extra whitespaces that aren't necessary. * es/rebase-i-count-todo: rebase-interactive: re-word "item count" comment rebase-interactive: suppress whitespace preceding item count

Merge branch 'es/rebase-i-count-todo'

2015-03-17T23:01:29Z

rebase-interactive: re-word "item count" comment

2015-03-06T20:25:33Z

97f05f43 (Show number of TODO items for interactive rebase, 2014-12-10) taught rebase-interactive to display an item count in the instruction list comments: # Rebase 46640c6..5568fd5 onto 46640c6 (4 TODO item(s)) # # Commands: # p, pick = use commit # ... However, with the exception of the --edit-todo option, "TODO" is a one-off term, never presented to the user by rebase-interactive in any other context. The item count is in fact the number of commands ("pick", "edit", etc.) remaining on the instruction sheet, and the comment immediately following it talks about "Commands". Consequently, replace "(# TODO item(s))" with the more accurate and meaningful "(# command(s))". Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano