git/http-push.c, branch v2.30.2

strvec: rename struct fields

2020-07-31T02:18:06Z

The "argc" and "argv" names made sense when the struct was argv_array, but now they're just confusing. Let's rename them to "nr" (which we use for counts elsewhere) and "v" (which is rather terse, but reads well when combined with typical variable names like "args.v"). Note that we have to update all of the callers immediately. Playing tricks with the preprocessor is hard here, because we wouldn't want to rewrite unrelated tokens. Signed-off-by: Jeff King Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

strvec: fix indentation in renamed calls

2020-07-28T22:02:18Z

Code which split an argv_array call across multiple lines, like: argv_array_pushl(&args, "one argument", "another argument", "and more", NULL); was recently mechanically renamed to use strvec, which results in mis-matched indentation like: strvec_pushl(&args, "one argument", "another argument", "and more", NULL); Let's fix these up to align the arguments with the opening paren. I did this manually by sifting through the results of: git jump grep 'strvec_.*,$' and liberally applying my editor's auto-format. Most of the changes are of the form shown above, though I also normalized a few that had originally used a single-tab indentation (rather than our usual style of aligning with the open paren). I also rewrapped a couple of obvious cases (e.g., where previously too-long lines became short enough to fit on one), but I wasn't aggressive about it. In cases broken to three or more lines, the grouping of arguments is sometimes meaningful, and it wasn't worth my time or reviewer time to ponder each case individually. Signed-off-by: Jeff King Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

strvec: convert more callers away from argv_array name

2020-07-28T22:02:18Z

We eventually want to drop the argv_array name and just use strvec consistently. There's no particular reason we have to do it all at once, or care about interactions between converted and unconverted bits. Because of our preprocessor compat layer, the names are interchangeable to the compiler (so even a definition and declaration using different names is OK). This patch converts remaining files from the first half of the alphabet, to keep the diff to a manageable size. The conversion was done purely mechanically with: git ls-files '*.c' '*.h' | xargs perl -i -pe ' s/ARGV_ARRAY/STRVEC/g; s/argv_array/strvec/g; ' and then selectively staging files with "git add '[abcdefghjkl]*'". We'll deal with any indentation/style fallouts separately. Signed-off-by: Jeff King Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

strvec: rename files from argv-array to strvec

2020-07-28T22:02:17Z

This requires updating #include lines across the code-base, but that's all fairly mechanical, and was done with: git ls-files '*.c' '*.h' | xargs perl -i -pe 's/argv-array.h/strvec.h/' Signed-off-by: Jeff King Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'bc/http-push-flagsfix'

2020-07-07T05:09:17Z

The code to push changes over "dumb" HTTP had a bad interaction with the commit reachability code due to incorrect allocation of object flag bits, which has been corrected. * bc/http-push-flagsfix: http-push: ensure unforced pushes fail when data would be lost

http-push: ensure unforced pushes fail when data would be lost

2020-06-23T22:40:59Z

When we push using the DAV-based protocol, the client is the one that performs the ref updates and therefore makes the checks to see whether an unforced push should be allowed. We make this check by determining if either (a) we lack the object file for the old value of the ref or (b) the new value of the ref is not newer than the old value, and in either case, reject the push. However, the ref_newer function, which performs this latter check, has an odd behavior due to the reuse of certain object flags. Specifically, it will incorrectly return false in its first invocation and then correctly return true on a subsequent invocation. This occurs because the object flags used by http-push.c are the same as those used by commit-reach.c, which implements ref_newer, and one piece of code misinterprets the flags set by the other. Note that this does not occur in all cases. For example, if the example used in the tests is changed to use one repository instead of two and rewind the head to add a commit, the test passes and we correctly reject the push. However, the example provided does trigger this behavior, and the code has been broken in this way since at least Git 2.0.0. To solve this problem, let's move the two sets of object flags so that they don't overlap, since we're clearly using them at the same time. The new set should not conflict with other usage because other users are either builtin code (which is not compiled into git http-push) or upload-pack (which we similarly do not use here). Reported-by: Michael Ward Signed-off-by: René Scharfe Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

http: refactor finish_http_pack_request()

2020-06-11T01:06:34Z

finish_http_pack_request() does multiple tasks, including some housekeeping on a struct packed_git - (1) closing its index, (2) removing it from a list, and (3) installing it. These concerns are independent of fetching a pack through HTTP: they are there only because (1) the calling code opens the pack's index before deciding to fetch it, (2) the calling code maintains a list of packfiles that can be fetched, and (3) the calling code fetches it in order to make use of its objects in the same process. In preparation for a subsequent commit, which adds a feature that does not need any of this housekeeping, remove (1), (2), and (3) from finish_http_pack_request(). (2) and (3) are now done by a helper function, and (1) is the responsibility of the caller (in this patch, done closer to the point where the pack index is opened). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

http-push: simplify deleting a list item

2019-10-15T01:53:50Z

The first step for deleting an item from a linked list is to locate the item preceding it. Be more careful in release_request() and handle an empty list. This only has consequences for invalid delete requests (removing the same item twice, or deleting an item that was never added to the list), but simplifies the loop condition as well as the check after the loop. Once we found the item's predecessor in the list, update its next pointer to skip over the item, which removes it from the list. In other words: Make the item's successor the successor of its predecessor. (At this point entry->next == request and prev->next == lock, respectively.) This is a bit simpler and saves a pointer dereference. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

object: convert lookup_object() to use object_id

2019-06-20T17:18:09Z

There are no callers left of lookup_object() that aren't just passing us the "hash" member of a "struct object_id". Let's take the whole struct, which gets us closer to removing all raw sha1 variables. It also matches the existing conversions of lookup_blob(), etc. The conversions of callers were done by hand, but they're all mechanical one-liners. Signed-off-by: Jeff King Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

object: convert lookup_unknown_object() to use object_id

2019-06-20T17:06:19Z

There are no callers left of lookup_unknown_object() that aren't just passing us the "hash" member of a "struct object_id". Let's take the whole struct, which gets us closer to removing all raw sha1 variables. It also matches the existing conversions of lookup_blob(), etc. The conversions of callers were done by hand, but they're all mechanical one-liners. Signed-off-by: Jeff King Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano