<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>git/pack-objects.c, branch v2.20.2</title>
<subtitle>Mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/
</subtitle>
<id>https://git.shady.money/git/atom?h=v2.20.2</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.shady.money/git/atom?h=v2.20.2'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/git/'/>
<updated>2018-10-30T06:43:43Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>Merge branch 'js/pack-objects-mutex-init-fix'</title>
<updated>2018-10-30T06:43:43Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Junio C Hamano</name>
<email>gitster@pobox.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-10-30T06:43:43Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/git/commit/?id=620b00e1671a8b4c1b00dbea8a0e81a657f28ce1'/>
<id>urn:sha1:620b00e1671a8b4c1b00dbea8a0e81a657f28ce1</id>
<content type='text'>
A mutex used in "git pack-objects" were not correctly initialized
and this caused "git repack" to dump core on Windows.

* js/pack-objects-mutex-init-fix:
  pack-objects (mingw): initialize `packing_data` mutex in the correct spot
  pack-objects (mingw): demonstrate a segmentation fault with large deltas
  pack-objects: fix typo 'detla' -&gt; 'delta'
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pack-objects (mingw): initialize `packing_data` mutex in the correct spot</title>
<updated>2018-10-19T05:28:44Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Johannes Schindelin</name>
<email>johannes.schindelin@gmx.de</email>
</author>
<published>2018-10-16T21:02:52Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/git/commit/?id=34204c81668324480e1f34a09cce9c21fabf4b40'/>
<id>urn:sha1:34204c81668324480e1f34a09cce9c21fabf4b40</id>
<content type='text'>
In 9ac3f0e5b3e4 (pack-objects: fix performance issues on packing large
deltas, 2018-07-22), a mutex was introduced that is used to guard the
call to set the delta size. This commit even added code to initialize
it, but at an incorrect spot: in `init_threaded_search()`, while the
call to `oe_set_delta_size()` (and hence to `packing_data_lock()`) can
happen in the call chain `check_object()` &lt;- `get_object_details()` &lt;-
`prepare_pack()` &lt;- `cmd_pack_objects()`, which is long before the
`prepare_pack()` function calls `ll_find_deltas()` (which initializes
the threaded search).

Another tell-tale that the mutex was initialized in an incorrect spot is
that the function to initialize it lives in builtin/, while the code
that uses the mutex is defined in a libgit.a header file.

Let's use a more appropriate function: `prepare_packing_data()`, which
not only lives in libgit.a, but *has* to be called before the
`packing_data` struct is used that contains that mutex.

This fixes https://github.com/git-for-windows/git/issues/1839.

Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin &lt;johannes.schindelin@gmx.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge branch 'jk/cocci'</title>
<updated>2018-09-17T20:53:57Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Junio C Hamano</name>
<email>gitster@pobox.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-09-17T20:53:57Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/git/commit/?id=769af0fd9ea0b4de172b51ae4b9ea41b57c02fd3'/>
<id>urn:sha1:769af0fd9ea0b4de172b51ae4b9ea41b57c02fd3</id>
<content type='text'>
spatch transformation to replace boolean uses of !hashcmp() to
newly introduced oideq() is added, and applied, to regain
performance lost due to support of multiple hash algorithms.

* jk/cocci:
  show_dirstat: simplify same-content check
  read-cache: use oideq() in ce_compare functions
  convert hashmap comparison functions to oideq()
  convert "hashcmp() != 0" to "!hasheq()"
  convert "oidcmp() != 0" to "!oideq()"
  convert "hashcmp() == 0" to hasheq()
  convert "oidcmp() == 0" to oideq()
  introduce hasheq() and oideq()
  coccinelle: use &lt;...&gt; for function exclusion
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge branch 'cc/delta-islands'</title>
<updated>2018-09-17T20:53:55Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Junio C Hamano</name>
<email>gitster@pobox.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-09-17T20:53:55Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/git/commit/?id=f3504ea3dd21b0a6d38bcd369efa0663cdc05416'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f3504ea3dd21b0a6d38bcd369efa0663cdc05416</id>
<content type='text'>
Lift code from GitHub to restrict delta computation so that an
object that exists in one fork is not made into a delta against
another object that does not appear in the same forked repository.

* cc/delta-islands:
  pack-objects: move 'layer' into 'struct packing_data'
  pack-objects: move tree_depth into 'struct packing_data'
  t5320: tests for delta islands
  repack: add delta-islands support
  pack-objects: add delta-islands support
  pack-objects: refactor code into compute_layer_order()
  Add delta-islands.{c,h}
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge branch 'jk/pack-delta-reuse-with-bitmap'</title>
<updated>2018-09-17T20:53:53Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Junio C Hamano</name>
<email>gitster@pobox.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-09-17T20:53:53Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/git/commit/?id=3ebdef2e1b4c89fd193140b36c04b41eb7f9a86d'/>
<id>urn:sha1:3ebdef2e1b4c89fd193140b36c04b41eb7f9a86d</id>
<content type='text'>
When creating a thin pack, which allows objects to be made into a
delta against another object that is not in the resulting pack but
is known to be present on the receiving end, the code learned to
take advantage of the reachability bitmap; this allows the server
to send a delta against a base beyond the "boundary" commit.

* jk/pack-delta-reuse-with-bitmap:
  pack-objects: reuse on-disk deltas for thin "have" objects
  pack-bitmap: save "have" bitmap from walk
  t/perf: add perf tests for fetches from a bitmapped server
  t/perf: add infrastructure for measuring sizes
  t/perf: factor out percent calculations
  t/perf: factor boilerplate out of test_perf
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge branch 'ds/multi-pack-index'</title>
<updated>2018-09-17T20:53:50Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Junio C Hamano</name>
<email>gitster@pobox.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-09-17T20:53:50Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/git/commit/?id=49f210fd5279eeb0106cd7e4383a1c4454d30428'/>
<id>urn:sha1:49f210fd5279eeb0106cd7e4383a1c4454d30428</id>
<content type='text'>
When there are too many packfiles in a repository (which is not
recommended), looking up an object in these would require
consulting many pack .idx files; a new mechanism to have a single
file that consolidates all of these .idx files is introduced.

* ds/multi-pack-index: (32 commits)
  pack-objects: consider packs in multi-pack-index
  midx: test a few commands that use get_all_packs
  treewide: use get_all_packs
  packfile: add all_packs list
  midx: fix bug that skips midx with alternates
  midx: stop reporting garbage
  midx: mark bad packed objects
  multi-pack-index: store local property
  multi-pack-index: provide more helpful usage info
  midx: clear midx on repack
  packfile: skip loading index if in multi-pack-index
  midx: prevent duplicate packfile loads
  midx: use midx in approximate_object_count
  midx: use existing midx when writing new one
  midx: use midx in abbreviation calculations
  midx: read objects from multi-pack-index
  config: create core.multiPackIndex setting
  midx: write object offsets
  midx: write object id fanout chunk
  midx: write object ids in a chunk
  ...
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>convert "hashcmp() == 0" to hasheq()</title>
<updated>2018-08-29T18:32:49Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jeff King</name>
<email>peff@peff.net</email>
</author>
<published>2018-08-28T21:22:44Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/git/commit/?id=e3ff0683e22070ce42c3c373f6e89e9dc38b756c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:e3ff0683e22070ce42c3c373f6e89e9dc38b756c</id>
<content type='text'>
This is the partner patch to the previous one, but covering
the "hash" variants instead of "oid".  Note that our
coccinelle rule is slightly more complex to avoid triggering
the call in hasheq().

I didn't bother to add a new rule to convert:

  - hasheq(E1-&gt;hash, E2-&gt;hash)
  + oideq(E1, E2)

Since these are new functions, there won't be any such
existing callers. And since most of the code is already
using oideq, we're not likely to introduce new ones.

We might still see "!hashcmp(E1-&gt;hash, E2-&gt;hash)" from topics
in flight. But because our new rule comes after the existing
ones, that should first get converted to "!oidcmp(E1, E2)"
and then to "oideq(E1, E2)".

Signed-off-by: Jeff King &lt;peff@peff.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge branch 'nd/pack-deltify-regression-fix'</title>
<updated>2018-08-22T18:17:05Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Junio C Hamano</name>
<email>gitster@pobox.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-08-22T18:17:05Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/git/commit/?id=29d9e3e2c47dd4b5053b0a98c891878d398463e3'/>
<id>urn:sha1:29d9e3e2c47dd4b5053b0a98c891878d398463e3</id>
<content type='text'>
In a recent update in 2.18 era, "git pack-objects" started
producing a larger than necessary packfiles by missing
opportunities to use large deltas.

* nd/pack-deltify-regression-fix:
  pack-objects: fix performance issues on packing large deltas
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>pack-objects: reuse on-disk deltas for thin "have" objects</title>
<updated>2018-08-21T19:45:49Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jeff King</name>
<email>peff@peff.net</email>
</author>
<published>2018-08-21T19:07:05Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/git/commit/?id=6a1e32d532c5948071e322cefc7052be6228adc3'/>
<id>urn:sha1:6a1e32d532c5948071e322cefc7052be6228adc3</id>
<content type='text'>
When we serve a fetch, we pass the "wants" and "haves" from
the fetch negotiation to pack-objects. That tells us not
only which objects we need to send, but we also use the
boundary commits as "preferred bases": their trees and blobs
are candidates for delta bases, both for reusing on-disk
deltas and for finding new ones.

However, this misses some opportunities. Modulo some special
cases like shallow or partial clones, we know that every
object reachable from the "haves" could be a preferred base.
We don't use all of them for two reasons:

  1. It's expensive to traverse the whole history and
     enumerate all of the objects the other side has.

  2. The delta search is expensive, so we want to keep the
     number of candidate bases sane. The boundary commits
     are the most likely to work.

When we have reachability bitmaps, though, reason 1 no
longer applies. We can efficiently compute the set of
reachable objects on the other side (and in fact already did
so as part of the bitmap set-difference to get the list of
interesting objects). And using this set conveniently
covers the shallow and partial cases, since we have to
disable the use of bitmaps for those anyway.

The second reason argues against using these bases in the
search for new deltas. But there's one case where we can use
this information for free: when we have an existing on-disk
delta that we're considering reusing, we can do so if we
know the other side has the base object. This in fact saves
time during the delta search, because it's one less delta we
have to compute.

And that's exactly what this patch does: when we're
considering whether to reuse an on-disk delta, if bitmaps
tell us the other side has the object (and we're making a
thin-pack), then we reuse it.

Here are the results on p5311 using linux.git, which
simulates a client fetching after `N` days since their last
fetch:

 Test                         origin              HEAD
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
 5311.3: server   (1 days)    0.27(0.27+0.04)     0.12(0.09+0.03) -55.6%
 5311.4: size     (1 days)               0.9M              237.0K -73.7%
 5311.5: client   (1 days)    0.04(0.05+0.00)     0.10(0.10+0.00) +150.0%
 5311.7: server   (2 days)    0.34(0.42+0.04)     0.13(0.10+0.03) -61.8%
 5311.8: size     (2 days)               1.5M              347.7K -76.5%
 5311.9: client   (2 days)    0.07(0.08+0.00)     0.16(0.15+0.01) +128.6%
 5311.11: server   (4 days)   0.56(0.77+0.08)     0.13(0.10+0.02) -76.8%
 5311.12: size     (4 days)              2.8M              566.6K -79.8%
 5311.13: client   (4 days)   0.13(0.15+0.00)     0.34(0.31+0.02) +161.5%
 5311.15: server   (8 days)   0.97(1.39+0.11)     0.30(0.25+0.05) -69.1%
 5311.16: size     (8 days)              4.3M                1.0M -76.0%
 5311.17: client   (8 days)   0.20(0.22+0.01)     0.53(0.52+0.01) +165.0%
 5311.19: server  (16 days)   1.52(2.51+0.12)     0.30(0.26+0.03) -80.3%
 5311.20: size    (16 days)              8.0M                2.0M -74.5%
 5311.21: client  (16 days)   0.40(0.47+0.03)     1.01(0.98+0.04) +152.5%
 5311.23: server  (32 days)   2.40(4.44+0.20)     0.31(0.26+0.04) -87.1%
 5311.24: size    (32 days)             14.1M                4.1M -70.9%
 5311.25: client  (32 days)   0.70(0.90+0.03)     1.81(1.75+0.06) +158.6%
 5311.27: server  (64 days)   11.76(26.57+0.29)   0.55(0.50+0.08) -95.3%
 5311.28: size    (64 days)             89.4M               47.4M -47.0%
 5311.29: client  (64 days)   5.71(9.31+0.27)     15.20(15.20+0.32) +166.2%
 5311.31: server (128 days)   16.15(36.87+0.40)   0.91(0.82+0.14) -94.4%
 5311.32: size   (128 days)            134.8M              100.4M -25.5%
 5311.33: client (128 days)   9.42(16.86+0.49)    25.34(25.80+0.46) +169.0%

In all cases we save CPU time on the server (sometimes
significant) and the resulting pack is smaller. We do spend
more CPU time on the client side, because it has to
reconstruct more deltas. But that's the right tradeoff to
make, since clients tend to outnumber servers. It just means
the thin pack mechanism is doing its job.

From the user's perspective, the end-to-end time of the
operation will generally be faster. E.g., in the 128-day
case, we saved 15s on the server at a cost of 16s on the
client. Since the resulting pack is 34MB smaller, this is a
net win if the network speed is less than 270Mbit/s. And
that's actually the worst case. The 64-day case saves just
over 11s at a cost of just under 11s. So it's a slight win
at any network speed, and the 40MB saved is pure bonus. That
trend continues for the smaller fetches.

The implementation itself is mostly straightforward, with
the new logic going into check_object(). But there are two
tricky bits.

The first is that check_object() needs access to the
relevant information (the thin flag and bitmap result). We
can do this by pushing these into program-lifetime globals.

The second is that the rest of the code assumes that any
reused delta will point to another "struct object_entry" as
its base. But of course the case we are interested in here
is the one where don't have such an entry!

I looked at a number of options that didn't quite work:

 - we could use a flag to signal a reused delta, but it's
   not a single bit. We have to actually store the oid of
   the base, which is normally done by pointing to the
   existing object_entry. And we'd have to modify all the
   code which looks at deltas.

 - we could add the reused bases to the end of the existing
   object_entry array. While this does create some extra
   work as later stages consider the extra entries, it's
   actually not too bad (we're not sending them, so they
   don't cost much in the delta search, and at most we'd
   have 2*N of them).

   But there's a more subtle problem. Adding to the existing
   array means we might need to grow it with realloc, which
   could move the earlier entries around. While many of the
   references to other entries are done by integer index,
   some (including ones on the stack) use pointers, which
   would become invalidated.

   This isn't insurmountable, but it would require quite a
   bit of refactoring (and it's hard to know that you've got
   it all, since it may work _most_ of the time and then
   fail subtly based on memory allocation patterns).

 - we could allocate a new one-off entry for the base. In
   fact, this is what an earlier version of this patch did.
   However, since the refactoring brought in by ad635e82d6
   (Merge branch 'nd/pack-objects-pack-struct', 2018-05-23),
   the delta_idx code requires that both entries be in the
   main packing list.

So taking all of those options into account, what I ended up
with is a separate list of "external bases" that are not
part of the main packing list. Each delta entry that points
to an external base has a single-bit flag to do so; we have a
little breathing room in the bitfield section of
object_entry.

This lets us limit the change primarily to the oe_delta()
and oe_set_delta_ext() functions. And as a bonus, most of
the rest of the code does not consider these dummy entries
at all, saving both runtime CPU and code complexity.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King &lt;peff@peff.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>treewide: use get_all_packs</title>
<updated>2018-08-20T22:31:40Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Derrick Stolee</name>
<email>dstolee@microsoft.com</email>
</author>
<published>2018-08-20T16:52:04Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/git/commit/?id=454ea2e4d7036862e8b2f69ef2dea640f8787510'/>
<id>urn:sha1:454ea2e4d7036862e8b2f69ef2dea640f8787510</id>
<content type='text'>
There are many places in the codebase that want to iterate over
all packfiles known to Git. The purposes are wide-ranging, and
those that can take advantage of the multi-pack-index already
do. So, use get_all_packs() instead of get_packed_git() to be
sure we are iterating over all packfiles.

Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee &lt;dstolee@microsoft.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
