git/run-command.h, branch v2.8.2

Merge branch 'sb/submodule-parallel-fetch'

2016-03-04T21:46:30Z

Simplify the two callback functions that are triggered when the child process terminates to avoid misuse of the child-process structure that has already been cleaned up. * sb/submodule-parallel-fetch: run-command: do not pass child process data into callbacks

run-command: do not pass child process data into callbacks

2016-03-01T17:42:01Z

The expected way to pass data into the callback is to pass them via the customizable callback pointer. The error reporting in default_{start_failure, task_finished} is not user friendly enough, that we want to encourage using the child data for such purposes. Furthermore the struct child data is cleaned by the run-command API, before we access them in the callbacks, leading to use-after-free situations. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'jk/epipe-in-async'

2016-02-26T21:37:26Z

Handling of errors while writing into our internal asynchronous process has been made more robust, which reduces flakiness in our tests. * jk/epipe-in-async: t5504: handle expected output from SIGPIPE death test_must_fail: report number of unexpected signal fetch-pack: ignore SIGPIPE in sideband demuxer write_or_die: handle EPIPE in async threads

write_or_die: handle EPIPE in async threads

2016-02-25T21:51:45Z

When write_or_die() sees EPIPE, it treats it specially by converting it into a SIGPIPE death. We obviously cannot ignore it, as the write has failed and the caller expects us to die. But likewise, we cannot just call die(), because printing any message at all would be a nuisance during normal operations. However, this is a problem if write_or_die() is called from a thread. Our raised signal ends up killing the whole process, when logically we just need to kill the thread (after all, if we are ignoring SIGPIPE, there is good reason to think that the main thread is expecting to handle it). Inside an async thread, the die() code already does the right thing, because we use our custom die_async() routine, which calls pthread_join(). So ideally we would piggy-back on that, and simply call: die_quietly_with_code(141); or similar. But refactoring the die code to do this is surprisingly non-trivial. The die_routines themselves handle both printing and the decision of the exit code. Every one of them would have to be modified to take new parameters for the code, and to tell us to be quiet. Instead, we can just teach write_or_die() to check for the async case and handle it specially. We do have to build an interface to abstract the async exit, but it's simple and self-contained. If we had many call-sites that wanted to do this die_quietly_with_code(), this approach wouldn't scale as well, but we don't. This is the only place where do this weird exit trick. Signed-off-by: Jeff King Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

run-command: add an asynchronous parallel child processor

2015-12-16T20:06:08Z

This allows to run external commands in parallel with ordered output on stderr. If we run external commands in parallel we cannot pipe the output directly to the our stdout/err as it would mix up. So each process's output will flow through a pipe, which we buffer. One subprocess can be directly piped to out stdout/err for a low latency feedback to the user. Example: Let's assume we have 5 submodules A,B,C,D,E and each fetch takes a different amount of time as the different submodules vary in size, then the output of fetches in sequential order might look like this: time --> output: |---A---| |-B-| |-------C-------| |-D-| |-E-| When we schedule these submodules into maximal two parallel processes, a schedule and sample output over time may look like this: process 1: |---A---| |-D-| |-E-| process 2: |-B-| |-------C-------| output: |---A---|B|---C-------|DE So A will be perceived as it would run normally in the single child version. As B has finished by the time A is done, we can dump its whole progress buffer on stderr, such that it looks like it finished in no time. Once that is done, C is determined to be the visible child and its progress will be reported in real time. So this way of output is really good for human consumption, as it only changes the timing, not the actual output. For machine consumption the output needs to be prepared in the tasks, by either having a prefix per line or per block to indicate whose tasks output is displayed, because the output order may not follow the original sequential ordering: |----A----| |--B--| |-C-| will be scheduled to be all parallel: process 1: |----A----| process 2: |--B--| process 3: |-C-| output: |----A----|CB This happens because C finished before B did, so it will be queued for output before B. To detect when a child has finished executing, we check interleaved with other actions (such as checking the liveliness of children or starting new processes) whether the stderr pipe still exists. Once a child closed its stderr stream, we assume it is terminating very soon, and use `finish_command()` from the single external process execution interface to collect the exit status. By maintaining the strong assumption of stderr being open until the very end of a child process, we can avoid other hassle such as an implementation using `waitpid(-1)`, which is not implemented in Windows. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'rs/daemon-plug-child-leak'

2015-11-03T23:13:12Z

"git daemon" uses "run_command()" without "finish_command()", so it needs to release resources itself, which it forgot to do. * rs/daemon-plug-child-leak: daemon: plug memory leak run-command: factor out child_process_clear()

run-command: factor out child_process_clear()

2015-11-02T23:01:00Z

Avoid duplication by moving the code to release allocated memory for arguments and environment to its own function, child_process_clear(). Export it to provide a counterpart to child_process_init(). Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Merge branch 'ti/glibc-stdio-mutex-from-signal-handler'

2015-10-07T20:38:16Z

Allocation related functions and stdio are unsafe things to call inside a signal handler, and indeed killing the pager can cause glibc to deadlock waiting on allocation mutex as our signal handler tries to free() some data structures in wait_for_pager(). Reduce these unsafe calls. * ti/glibc-stdio-mutex-from-signal-handler: pager: don't use unsafe functions in signal handlers

Merge branch 'jk/async-pkt-line'

2015-10-05T19:30:09Z

The debugging infrastructure for pkt-line based communication has been improved to mark the side-band communication specifically. * jk/async-pkt-line: pkt-line: show packets in async processes as "sideband" run-command: provide in_async query function

pager: don't use unsafe functions in signal handlers

2015-09-04T21:57:51Z

Since the commit a3da8821208d (pager: do wait_for_pager on signal death), we call wait_for_pager() in the pager's signal handler. The recent bug report revealed that this causes a deadlock in glibc at aborting "git log" [*1*]. When this happens, git process is left unterminated, and it can't be killed by SIGTERM but only by SIGKILL. The problem is that wait_for_pager() function does more than waiting for pager process's termination, but it does cleanups and printing errors. Unfortunately, the functions that may be used in a signal handler are very limited [*2*]. Particularly, malloc(), free() and the variants can't be used in a signal handler because they take a mutex internally in glibc. This was the cause of the deadlock above. Other than the direct calls of malloc/free, many functions calling malloc/free can't be used. strerror() is such one, either. Also the usage of fflush() and printf() in a signal handler is bad, although it seems working so far. In a safer side, we should avoid them, too. This patch tries to reduce the calls of such functions in signal handlers. wait_for_signal() takes a flag and avoids the unsafe calls. Also, finish_command_in_signal() is introduced for the same reason. There the free() calls are removed, and only waits for the children without whining at errors. [*1*] https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=942297 [*2*] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/V2_chap02.html#tag_15_04_03 Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Reviewed-by: Jeff King Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano