<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>linux/Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst, branch v6.8</title>
<subtitle>Mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/
</subtitle>
<id>https://git.shady.money/linux/atom?h=v6.8</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/atom?h=v6.8'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/'/>
<updated>2024-02-20T10:52:41Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: update the link to the CI repo</title>
<updated>2024-02-20T10:52:41Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2024-02-16T16:19:45Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/commit/?id=23f9c2c066e7e5052406fb8f04a115d3d0260b22'/>
<id>urn:sha1:23f9c2c066e7e5052406fb8f04a115d3d0260b22</id>
<content type='text'>
Netronome graciously transferred the original NIPA repo
to our new netdev umbrella org. Link to that instead of
my private fork.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman &lt;horms@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240216161945.2208842-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni &lt;pabeni@redhat.com&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: try to guide people on dealing with silence</title>
<updated>2023-11-21T22:35:43Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-11-20T20:01:09Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/commit/?id=495ec91b48e489afefb2ad714f0d9b68c3016c6c'/>
<id>urn:sha1:495ec91b48e489afefb2ad714f0d9b68c3016c6c</id>
<content type='text'>
There has been more than a few threads which went idle before
the merge window and now people came back to them and started
asking about next steps.

We currently tell people to be patient and not to repost too
often. Our "not too often", however, is still a few orders of
magnitude faster than other subsystems. Or so I feel after
hearing people talk about review rates at LPC.

Clarify in the doc that if the discussion went idle for a week
on netdev, 95% of the time there's no point waiting longer.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120200109.620392-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: try to encourage (netdev?) reviewers</title>
<updated>2023-10-15T13:26:51Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-10-11T02:42:24Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/commit/?id=6e55b1cbf05dca4651692be6c59acb7b20186653'/>
<id>urn:sha1:6e55b1cbf05dca4651692be6c59acb7b20186653</id>
<content type='text'>
Add a section to netdev maintainer doc encouraging reviewers
to chime in on the mailing list.

The questions about "when is it okay to share feedback"
keep coming up (most recently at netconf) and the answer
is "pretty much always".

Extend the section of 7.AdvancedTopics.rst which deals
with reviews a little bit to add stuff we had been recommending
locally.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli &lt;florian.fainelli@broadcom.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Martin Habets &lt;habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: update the netdev infra URLs</title>
<updated>2023-09-04T09:59:13Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-09-01T21:17:18Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/commit/?id=5245008738029135af52a2048d9fe9c4dd9be698'/>
<id>urn:sha1:5245008738029135af52a2048d9fe9c4dd9be698</id>
<content type='text'>
Some corporate proxies block our current NIPA URLs because
they use a free / shady DNS domain. As suggested by Jesse
we got a new DNS entry from Konstantin - netdev.bots.linux.dev,
use it.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman &lt;horms@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: document patchwork patch states</title>
<updated>2023-09-04T08:39:20Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-09-01T14:24:05Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/commit/?id=ee8ab74aa0c248138c14f74cc6a636e0191c410b'/>
<id>urn:sha1:ee8ab74aa0c248138c14f74cc6a636e0191c410b</id>
<content type='text'>
The patchwork states are largely self-explanatory but small
ambiguities may still come up. Document how we interpret
the states in networking.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: recommend against --in-reply-to</title>
<updated>2023-08-24T18:25:38Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-08-23T15:49:22Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/commit/?id=35b4b6d0c53a3872e846dbcda9074117efdc078a'/>
<id>urn:sha1:35b4b6d0c53a3872e846dbcda9074117efdc078a</id>
<content type='text'>
It's somewhat unfortunate but with (my?) the current tooling
if people post new versions of a set in reply to an old version
managing the review queue gets difficult. So recommend against it.

Reviewed-by: Martin Habets &lt;habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230823154922.1162644-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: update the URL of the status page</title>
<updated>2023-07-12T03:27:00Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-07-10T17:46:36Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/commit/?id=cf28792facaa9c1c4f5a246d6a364761f7835870'/>
<id>urn:sha1:cf28792facaa9c1c4f5a246d6a364761f7835870</id>
<content type='text'>
Move the status page from vger to the same server as mailbot.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230710174636.1174684-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: broaden mailbot to all MAINTAINERS</title>
<updated>2023-07-01T12:16:59Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-06-30T16:00:25Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/commit/?id=d5dc39459bdafd18ff1e93e1a86eb3e814ff9f94'/>
<id>urn:sha1:d5dc39459bdafd18ff1e93e1a86eb3e814ff9f94</id>
<content type='text'>
Reword slightly now that all MAINTAINERS have access to the commands.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman &lt;simon.horman@corigine.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller &lt;davem@davemloft.net&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: document the existence of the mail bot</title>
<updated>2023-05-24T04:11:54Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-05-22T23:09:03Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/commit/?id=7e7b3b097a9d95cd76fb462f83dc740b71bd73c0'/>
<id>urn:sha1:7e7b3b097a9d95cd76fb462f83dc740b71bd73c0</id>
<content type='text'>
We had a good run, but after 4 weeks of use we heard someone
asking about pw-bot commands. Let's explain its existence
in the docs. It's not a complete documentation but hopefully
it's enough for the casual contributor. The project and scope
are in flux so the details would likely become out of date,
if we were to document more in depth.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230522140057.GB18381@nucnuc.mle/
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn &lt;andrew@lunn.ch&gt;
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman &lt;simon.horman@corigine.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230522230903.1853151-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>docs: netdev: clarify the need to sending reverts as patches</title>
<updated>2023-03-29T06:51:05Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Jakub Kicinski</name>
<email>kuba@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2023-03-27T17:26:46Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.shady.money/linux/commit/?id=e70f94c6c75c2e3274df474b4c0bf6153e0533c3'/>
<id>urn:sha1:e70f94c6c75c2e3274df474b4c0bf6153e0533c3</id>
<content type='text'>
We don't state explicitly that reverts need to be submitted
as a patch. It occasionally comes up.

Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller &lt;jacob.e.keller@intel.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli &lt;f.fainelli@gmail.com&gt;
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230327172646.2622943-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski &lt;kuba@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
