linux/Documentation/sysctl, branch v4.15

Revert "mm/page-writeback.c: print a warning if the vm dirtiness settings are illogical"

2017-11-30T02:40:43Z

This reverts commit 0f6d24f87856 ("mm/page-writeback.c: print a warning if the vm dirtiness settings are illogical") because it causes false positive warnings during OOM situations as noticed by Tetsuo Handa: Node 0 active_anon:3525940kB inactive_anon:8372kB active_file:216kB inactive_file:1872kB unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB mapped:2504kB dirty:52kB writeback:0kB shmem:8660kB shmem_thp: 0kB shmem_pmdmapped: 0kB anon_thp: 636928kB writeback_tmp:0kB unstable:0kB all_unreclaimable? yes Node 0 DMA free:14848kB min:284kB low:352kB high:420kB active_anon:992kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB writepending:0kB present:15988kB managed:15904kB mlocked:0kB kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:24kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:0kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB lowmem_reserve[]: 0 2687 3645 3645 Node 0 DMA32 free:53004kB min:49608kB low:62008kB high:74408kB active_anon:2712648kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:0kB inactive_file:0kB unevictable:0kB writepending:0kB present:3129216kB managed:2773132kB mlocked:0kB kernel_stack:96kB pagetables:5096kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:0kB local_pcp:0kB free_cma:0kB lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 958 958 Node 0 Normal free:17140kB min:17684kB low:22104kB high:26524kB active_anon:812300kB inactive_anon:8372kB active_file:1228kB inactive_file:1868kB unevictable:0kB writepending:52kB present:1048576kB managed:981224kB mlocked:0kB kernel_stack:3520kB pagetables:8552kB bounce:0kB free_pcp:120kB local_pcp:120kB free_cma:0kB lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0 [...] Out of memory: Kill process 8459 (a.out) score 999 or sacrifice child Killed process 8459 (a.out) total-vm:4180kB, anon-rss:88kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB oom_reaper: reaped process 8459 (a.out), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB vm direct limit must be set greater than background limit. The problem is that both thresh and bg_thresh will be 0 if available_memory is less than 4 pages when evaluating global_dirtyable_memory. While this might be worked around the whole point of the warning is dubious at best. We do rely on admins to do sensible things when changing tunable knobs. Dirty memory writeback knobs are not any special in that regards so revert the warning rather than adding more hacks to work this around. Debugged by Yafang Shao. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171127091939.tahb77nznytcxw55@dhcp22.suse.cz Fixes: 0f6d24f87856 ("mm/page-writeback.c: print a warning if the vm dirtiness settings are illogical") Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa Cc: Yafang Shao Cc: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt: fix typo

2017-11-18T00:10:03Z

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAKW4uUyCi=PnKf3epgFVz8z=1tMtHSOHNm+fdNxrNw3-THvRCA@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kangmin Park Cc: Jiri Kosina Cc: Alan Cox Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm, sysctl: make NUMA stats configurable

2017-11-16T02:21:07Z

This is the second step which introduces a tunable interface that allow numa stats configurable for optimizing zone_statistics(), as suggested by Dave Hansen and Ying Huang. ========================================================================= When page allocation performance becomes a bottleneck and you can tolerate some possible tool breakage and decreased numa counter precision, you can do: echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/numa_stat In this case, numa counter update is ignored. We can see about *4.8%*(185->176) drop of cpu cycles per single page allocation and reclaim on Jesper's page_bench01 (single thread) and *8.1%*(343->315) drop of cpu cycles per single page allocation and reclaim on Jesper's page_bench03 (88 threads) running on a 2-Socket Broadwell-based server (88 threads, 126G memory). Benchmark link provided by Jesper D Brouer (increase loop times to 10000000): https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/tree/master/kernel/mm/bench ========================================================================= When page allocation performance is not a bottleneck and you want all tooling to work, you can do: echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/numa_stat This is system default setting. Many thanks to Michal Hocko, Dave Hansen, Ying Huang and Vlastimil Babka for comments to help improve the original patch. [keescook@chromium.org: make sure mutex is a global static] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171107213809.GA4314@beast Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508290927-8518-1-git-send-email-kemi.wang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Kemi Wang Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Reported-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Suggested-by: Dave Hansen Suggested-by: Ying Huang Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: "Luis R . Rodriguez" Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Christopher Lameter Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Tim Chen Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: Aaron Lu Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: consolidate page table accounting

2017-11-16T02:21:04Z

Currently, we account page tables separately for each page table level, but that's redundant -- we only make use of total memory allocated to page tables for oom_badness calculation. We also provide the information to userspace, but it has dubious value there too. This patch switches page table accounting to single counter. mm->pgtables_bytes is now used to account all page table levels. We use bytes, because page table size for different levels of page table tree may be different. The change has user-visible effect: we don't have VmPMD and VmPUD reported in /proc/[pid]/status. Not sure if anybody uses them. (As alternative, we can always report 0 kB for them.) OOM-killer report is also slightly changed: we now report pgtables_bytes instead of nr_ptes, nr_pmd, nr_puds. Apart from reducing number of counters per-mm, the benefit is that we now calculate oom_badness() more correctly for machines which have different size of page tables depending on level or where page tables are less than a page in size. The only downside can be debuggability because we do not know which page table level could leak. But I do not remember many bugs that would be caught by separate counters so I wouldn't lose sleep over this. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix mm/huge_memory.c] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171006100651.44742-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Acked-by: Michal Hocko [kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com: fix build] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171016150113.ikfxy3e7zzfvsr4w@black.fi.intel.com Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: account pud page tables

2017-11-16T02:21:04Z

On a machine with 5-level paging support a process can allocate significant amount of memory and stay unnoticed by oom-killer and memory cgroup. The trick is to allocate a lot of PUD page tables. We don't account PUD page tables, only PMD and PTE. We already addressed the same issue for PMD page tables, see commit dc6c9a35b66b ("mm: account pmd page tables to the process"). Introduction of 5-level paging brings the same issue for PUD page tables. The patch expands accounting to PUD level. [kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com: s/pmd_t/pud_t/] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171004074305.x35eh5u7ybbt5kar@black.fi.intel.com [heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com: s390/mm: fix pud table accounting] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171103090551.18231-1-heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171002080427.3320-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Acked-by: Rik van Riel Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/page-writeback.c: print a warning if the vm dirtiness settings are illogical

2017-11-16T02:21:03Z

The vm direct limit setting must be set greater than vm background limit setting. Otherwise print a warning to help the operator to figure out that the vm dirtiness settings is in illogical state. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1506592464-30962-1-git-send-email-laoar.shao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

docs: Update binfmt_misc links

2017-10-03T21:23:38Z

Documentation/binfmt_misc.txt moved to Documentation/admin-guide/binfmt-misc.rst Signed-off-by: Tom Saeger Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet

Merge tag 'seccomp-v4.14-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux

2017-09-23T02:16:41Z

Pull seccomp updates from Kees Cook: "Major additions: - sysctl and seccomp operation to discover available actions (tyhicks) - new per-filter configurable logging infrastructure and sysctl (tyhicks) - SECCOMP_RET_LOG to log allowed syscalls (tyhicks) - SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS as the new strictest possible action - self-tests for new behaviors" [ This is the seccomp part of the security pull request during the merge window that was nixed due to unrelated problems - Linus ] * tag 'seccomp-v4.14-rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux: samples: Unrename SECCOMP_RET_KILL selftests/seccomp: Test thread vs process killing seccomp: Implement SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS action seccomp: Introduce SECCOMP_RET_KILL_PROCESS seccomp: Rename SECCOMP_RET_KILL to SECCOMP_RET_KILL_THREAD seccomp: Action to log before allowing seccomp: Filter flag to log all actions except SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW seccomp: Selftest for detection of filter flag support seccomp: Sysctl to configure actions that are allowed to be logged seccomp: Operation for checking if an action is available seccomp: Sysctl to display available actions seccomp: Provide matching filter for introspection selftests/seccomp: Refactor RET_ERRNO tests selftests/seccomp: Add simple seccomp overhead benchmark selftests/seccomp: Add tests for basic ptrace actions

Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)

2017-09-07T03:49:49Z

Merge updates from Andrew Morton: - various misc bits - DAX updates - OCFS2 - most of MM * emailed patches from Andrew Morton : (119 commits) mm,fork: introduce MADV_WIPEONFORK x86,mpx: make mpx depend on x86-64 to free up VMA flag mm: add /proc/pid/smaps_rollup mm: hugetlb: clear target sub-page last when clearing huge page mm: oom: let oom_reap_task and exit_mmap run concurrently swap: choose swap device according to numa node mm: replace TIF_MEMDIE checks by tsk_is_oom_victim mm, oom: do not rely on TIF_MEMDIE for memory reserves access z3fold: use per-cpu unbuddied lists mm, swap: don't use VMA based swap readahead if HDD is used as swap mm, swap: add sysfs interface for VMA based swap readahead mm, swap: VMA based swap readahead mm, swap: fix swap readahead marking mm, swap: add swap readahead hit statistics mm/vmalloc.c: don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API mm/vmstat.c: fix wrong comment selftests/memfd: add memfd_create hugetlbfs selftest mm/shmem: add hugetlbfs support to memfd_create() mm, devm_memremap_pages: use multi-order radix for ZONE_DEVICE lookups mm/vmalloc.c: halve the number of comparisons performed in pcpu_get_vm_areas() ...

mm, page_alloc: rip out ZONELIST_ORDER_ZONE

2017-09-07T00:27:25Z

Patch series "cleanup zonelists initialization", v1. This is aimed at cleaning up the zonelists initialization code we have but the primary motivation was bug report [2] which got resolved but the usage of stop_machine is just too ugly to live. Most patches are straightforward but 3 of them need a special consideration. Patch 1 removes zone ordered zonelists completely. I am CCing linux-api because this is a user visible change. As I argue in the patch description I do not think we have a strong usecase for it these days. I have kept sysctl in place and warn into the log if somebody tries to configure zone lists ordering. If somebody has a real usecase for it we can revert this patch but I do not expect anybody will actually notice runtime differences. This patch is not strictly needed for the rest but it made patch 6 easier to implement. Patch 7 removes stop_machine from build_all_zonelists without adding any special synchronization between iterators and updater which I _believe_ is acceptable as explained in the changelog. I hope I am not missing anything. Patch 8 then removes zonelists_mutex which is kind of ugly as well and not really needed AFAICS but a care should be taken when double checking my thinking. This patch (of 9): Supporting zone ordered zonelists costs us just a lot of code while the usefulness is arguable if existent at all. Mel has already made node ordering default on 64b systems. 32b systems are still using ZONELIST_ORDER_ZONE because it is considered better to fallback to a different NUMA node rather than consume precious lowmem zones. This argument is, however, weaken by the fact that the memory reclaim has been reworked to be node rather than zone oriented. This means that lowmem requests have to skip over all highmem pages on LRUs already and so zone ordering doesn't save the reclaim time much. So the only advantage of the zone ordering is under a light memory pressure when highmem requests do not ever hit into lowmem zones and the lowmem pressure doesn't need to reclaim. Considering that 32b NUMA systems are rather suboptimal already and it is generally advisable to use 64b kernel on such a HW I believe we should rather care about the code maintainability and just get rid of ZONELIST_ORDER_ZONE altogether. Keep systcl in place and warn if somebody tries to set zone ordering either from kernel command line or the sysctl. [mhocko@suse.com: reading vm.numa_zonelist_order will never terminate] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170721143915.14161-2-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Acked-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Shaohua Li Cc: Toshi Kani Cc: Abdul Haleem Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds