linux/drivers/base/node.c, branch v5.3

mm/memory_hotplug: rename walk_memory_range() and pass start+size instead of pfns

2019-07-19T00:08:06Z

walk_memory_range() was once used to iterate over sections. Now, it iterates over memory blocks. Rename the function, fixup the documentation. Also, pass start+size instead of PFNs, which is what most callers already have at hand. (we'll rework link_mem_sections() most probably soon) Follow-up patches will rework, simplify, and move walk_memory_blocks() to drivers/base/memory.c. Note: walk_memory_blocks() only works correctly right now if the start_pfn is aligned to a section start. This is the case right now, but we'll generalize the function in a follow up patch so the semantics match the documentation. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused variable] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190614100114.311-5-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Len Brown Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Rashmica Gupta Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Michael Neuling Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Wei Yang Cc: Juergen Gross Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Arun KS Cc: Nick Desaulniers Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm: make register_mem_sect_under_node() static

2019-07-19T00:08:06Z

It is only used internally. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190614100114.311-4-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Keith Busch Cc: Oscar Salvador Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/memory_hotplug: make unregister_memory_block_under_nodes() never fail

2019-07-19T00:08:06Z

We really don't want anything during memory hotunplug to fail. We always pass a valid memory block device, that check can go. Avoid allocating memory and eventually failing. As we are always called under lock, we can use a static piece of memory. This avoids having to put the structure onto the stack, having to guess about the stack size of callers. Patch inspired by a patch from Oscar Salvador. In the future, there might be no need to iterate over nodes at all. mem->nid should tell us exactly what to remove. Memory block devices with mixed nodes (added during boot) should properly fenced off and never removed. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527111152.16324-11-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Wei Yang Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Alex Deucher Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Mark Brown Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Andrew Banman Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Arun KS Cc: Baoquan He Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Chintan Pandya Cc: Christophe Leroy Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Fenghua Yu Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Jun Yao Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Logan Gunthorpe Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Mathieu Malaterre Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: "mike.travis@hpe.com" Cc: Nicholas Piggin Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Rich Felker Cc: Rob Herring Cc: Robin Murphy Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Vasily Gorbik Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Yoshinori Sato Cc: Yu Zhao Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/memory_hotplug: remove memory block devices before arch_remove_memory()

2019-07-19T00:08:06Z

Let's factor out removing of memory block devices, which is only necessary for memory added via add_memory() and friends that created memory block devices. Remove the devices before calling arch_remove_memory(). This finishes factoring out memory block device handling from arch_add_memory() and arch_remove_memory(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527111152.16324-10-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Dan Williams Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: "mike.travis@hpe.com" Cc: Andrew Banman Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Alex Deucher Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Mark Brown Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Arun KS Cc: Mathieu Malaterre Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Anshuman Khandual Cc: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Baoquan He Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Chintan Pandya Cc: Christophe Leroy Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Fenghua Yu Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Jun Yao Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Logan Gunthorpe Cc: Mark Rutland Cc: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Michael Ellerman Cc: Mike Rapoport Cc: Nicholas Piggin Cc: Oscar Salvador Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Pavel Tatashin Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Rich Felker Cc: Rob Herring Cc: Robin Murphy Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tony Luck Cc: Vasily Gorbik Cc: Wei Yang Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Yoshinori Sato Cc: Yu Zhao Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

drivers: base/node.c: fixes a kernel-doc markups

2019-06-21T13:46:34Z

There was a typo at the name of the vars inside the kernel-doc comment, causing those warnings: ./drivers/base/node.c:690: warning: Function parameter or member 'mem_nid' not described in 'register_memory_node_under_compute_node' ./drivers/base/node.c:690: warning: Function parameter or member 'cpu_nid' not described in 'register_memory_node_under_compute_node' ./drivers/base/node.c:690: warning: Excess function parameter 'mem_node' description in 'register_memory_node_under_compute_node' ./drivers/base/node.c:690: warning: Excess function parameter 'cpu_node' description in 'register_memory_node_under_compute_node' There's also a description missing here: ./drivers/base/node.c:78: warning: Function parameter or member 'hmem_attrs' not described in 'node_access_nodes' Copy an existing description from another function call. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

node: Add memory-side caching attributes

2019-04-04T16:41:21Z

System memory may have caches to help improve access speed to frequently requested address ranges. While the system provided cache is transparent to the software accessing these memory ranges, applications can optimize their own access based on cache attributes. Provide a new API for the kernel to register these memory-side caches under the memory node that provides it. The new sysfs representation is modeled from the existing cpu cacheinfo attributes, as seen from /sys/devices/system/cpu//cache/. Unlike CPU cacheinfo though, the node cache level is reported from the view of the memory. A higher level number is nearer to the CPU, while lower levels are closer to the last level memory. The exported attributes are the cache size, the line size, associativity indexing, and write back policy, and add the attributes for the system memory caches to sysfs stable documentation. Signed-off-by: Keith Busch Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Reviewed-by: Brice Goglin Tested-by: Brice Goglin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

node: Add heterogenous memory access attributes

2019-04-04T16:41:21Z

Heterogeneous memory systems provide memory nodes with different latency and bandwidth performance attributes. Provide a new kernel interface for subsystems to register the attributes under the memory target node's initiator access class. If the system provides this information, applications may query these attributes when deciding which node to request memory. The following example shows the new sysfs hierarchy for a node exporting performance attributes: # tree -P "read*|write*"/sys/devices/system/node/nodeY/accessZ/initiators/ /sys/devices/system/node/nodeY/accessZ/initiators/ |-- read_bandwidth |-- read_latency |-- write_bandwidth `-- write_latency The bandwidth is exported as MB/s and latency is reported in nanoseconds. The values are taken from the platform as reported by the manufacturer. Memory accesses from an initiator node that is not one of the memory's access "Z" initiator nodes linked in the same directory may observe different performance than reported here. When a subsystem makes use of this interface, initiators of a different access number may not have the same performance relative to initiators in other access numbers, or omitted from the any access class' initiators. Descriptions for memory access initiator performance access attributes are added to sysfs stable documentation. Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Keith Busch Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Tested-by: Brice Goglin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

node: Link memory nodes to their compute nodes

2019-04-04T16:41:20Z

Systems may be constructed with various specialized nodes. Some nodes may provide memory, some provide compute devices that access and use that memory, and others may provide both. Nodes that provide memory are referred to as memory targets, and nodes that can initiate memory access are referred to as memory initiators. Memory targets will often have varying access characteristics from different initiators, and platforms may have ways to express those relationships. In preparation for these systems, provide interfaces for the kernel to export the memory relationship among different nodes memory targets and their initiators with symlinks to each other. If a system provides access locality for each initiator-target pair, nodes may be grouped into ranked access classes relative to other nodes. The new interface allows a subsystem to register relationships of varying classes if available and desired to be exported. A memory initiator may have multiple memory targets in the same access class. The target memory's initiators in a given class indicate the nodes access characteristics share the same performance relative to other linked initiator nodes. Each target within an initiator's access class, though, do not necessarily perform the same as each other. A memory target node may have multiple memory initiators. All linked initiators in a target's class have the same access characteristics to that target. The following example show the nodes' new sysfs hierarchy for a memory target node 'Y' with access class 0 from initiator node 'X': # symlinks -v /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/access0/ relative: /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/access0/targets/nodeY -> ../../nodeY # symlinks -v /sys/devices/system/node/nodeY/access0/ relative: /sys/devices/system/node/nodeY/access0/initiators/nodeX -> ../../nodeX The new attributes are added to the sysfs stable documentation. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Keith Busch Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Tested-by: Brice Goglin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm, proc: add KReclaimable to /proc/meminfo

2018-10-26T23:26:32Z

The vmstat NR_KERNEL_MISC_RECLAIMABLE counter is for kernel non-slab allocations that can be reclaimed via shrinker. In /proc/meminfo, we can show the sum of all reclaimable kernel allocations (including slab) as "KReclaimable". Add the same counter also to per-node meminfo under /sys With this counter, users will have more complete information about kernel memory usage. Non-slab reclaimable pages (currently just the ION allocator) will not be missing from /proc/meminfo, making users wonder where part of their memory went. More precisely, they already appear in MemAvailable, but without the new counter, it's not obvious why the value in MemAvailable doesn't fully correspond with the sum of other counters participating in it. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180731090649.16028-6-vbabka@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Roman Gushchin Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Laura Abbott Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Sumit Semwal Cc: Vijayanand Jitta Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

mm/memory_hotplug.c: drop unnecessary checks from register_mem_sect_under_node()

2018-08-17T23:20:29Z

Callers of register_mem_sect_under_node() are always passing a valid memory_block (not NULL), so we can safely drop the check for NULL. In the same way, register_mem_sect_under_node() is only called in case the node is online, so we can safely remove that check as well. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180622111839.10071-5-osalvador@techadventures.net Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin Tested-by: Reza Arbab Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Pasha Tatashin Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Vlastimil Babka Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds