linux/include/net/netfilter, branch v5.3

netfilter: nf_tables: map basechain priority to hardware priority

2019-08-18T21:13:23Z

This patch adds initial support for offloading basechains using the priority range from 1 to 65535. This is restricting the netfilter priority range to 16-bit integer since this is what most drivers assume so far from tc. It should be possible to extend this range of supported priorities later on once drivers are updated to support for 32-bit integer priorities. Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

netfilter: nf_tables: use-after-free in failing rule with bound set

2019-08-09T12:41:13Z

If a rule that has already a bound anonymous set fails to be added, the preparation phase releases the rule and the bound set. However, the transaction object from the abort path still has a reference to the set object that is stale, leading to a use-after-free when checking for the set->bound field. Add a new field to the transaction that specifies if the set is bound, so the abort path can skip releasing it since the rule command owns it and it takes care of releasing it. After this update, the set->bound field is removed. [ 24.649883] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000040434 [ 24.657858] Mem abort info: [ 24.660686] ESR = 0x96000004 [ 24.663769] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 24.669725] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 24.672804] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 24.675975] Data abort info: [ 24.678880] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004 [ 24.682743] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 24.685723] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000428952000 [ 24.692207] [0000000000040434] pgd=0000000000000000 [ 24.697119] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] SMP [...] [ 24.889414] Call trace: [ 24.891870] __nf_tables_abort+0x3f0/0x7a0 [ 24.895984] nf_tables_abort+0x20/0x40 [ 24.899750] nfnetlink_rcv_batch+0x17c/0x588 [ 24.904037] nfnetlink_rcv+0x13c/0x190 [ 24.907803] netlink_unicast+0x18c/0x208 [ 24.911742] netlink_sendmsg+0x1b0/0x350 [ 24.915682] sock_sendmsg+0x4c/0x68 [ 24.919185] ___sys_sendmsg+0x288/0x2c8 [ 24.923037] __sys_sendmsg+0x7c/0xd0 [ 24.926628] __arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x2c/0x38 [ 24.930744] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x94/0x158 [ 24.935556] el0_svc_handler+0x34/0x90 [ 24.939322] el0_svc+0x8/0xc [ 24.942216] Code: 37280300 f9404023 91014262 aa1703e0 (f9401863) [ 24.948336] ---[ end trace cebbb9dcbed3b56f ]--- Fixes: f6ac85858976 ("netfilter: nf_tables: unbind set in rule from commit path") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso

net: flow_offload: add flow_block structure and use it

2019-07-20T04:27:45Z

This object stores the flow block callbacks that are attached to this block. Update flow_block_cb_lookup() to take this new object. This patch restores the block sharing feature. Fixes: da3eeb904ff4 ("net: flow_offload: add list handling functions") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Acked-by: Jiri Pirko Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

netfilter: synproxy: fix erroneous tcp mss option

2019-07-16T11:17:01Z

Now synproxy sends the mss value set by the user on client syn-ack packet instead of the mss value that client announced. Fixes: 48b1de4c110a ("netfilter: add SYNPROXY core/target") Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso

netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: fix expectation clash

2019-07-16T11:16:59Z

When conntracks change during a dialog, SDP messages may be sent from different conntracks to establish expects with identical tuples. In this case expects conflict may be detected for the 2nd SDP message and end up with a process failure. The fixing here is to reuse an existing expect who has the same tuple for a different conntrack if any. Here are two scenarios for the case. 1) SERVER CPE | INVITE SDP | 5060 |<----------------------|5060 | 100 Trying | 5060 |---------------------->|5060 | 183 SDP | 5060 |---------------------->|5060 ===> Conntrack 1 | PRACK | 50601 |<----------------------|5060 | 200 OK (PRACK) | 50601 |---------------------->|5060 | 200 OK (INVITE) | 5060 |---------------------->|5060 | ACK | 50601 |<----------------------|5060 | | |<--- RTP stream ------>| | | | INVITE SDP (t38) | 50601 |---------------------->|5060 ===> Conntrack 2 With a certain configuration in the CPE, SIP messages "183 with SDP" and "re-INVITE with SDP t38" will go through the sip helper to create expects for RTP and RTCP. It is okay to create RTP and RTCP expects for "183", whose master connection source port is 5060, and destination port is 5060. In the "183" message, port in Contact header changes to 50601 (from the original 5060). So the following requests e.g. PRACK and ACK are sent to port 50601. It is a different conntrack (let call Conntrack 2) from the original INVITE (let call Conntrack 1) due to the port difference. In this example, after the call is established, there is RTP stream but no RTCP stream for Conntrack 1, so the RTP expect created upon "183" is cleared, and RTCP expect created for Conntrack 1 retains. When "re-INVITE with SDP t38" arrives to create RTP&RTCP expects, current ALG implementation will call nf_ct_expect_related() for RTP and RTCP. The expects tuples are identical to those for Conntrack 1. RTP expect for Conntrack 2 succeeds in creation as the one for Conntrack 1 has been removed. RTCP expect for Conntrack 2 fails in creation because it has idential tuples and 'conflict' with the one retained for Conntrack 1. And then result in a failure in processing of the re-INVITE. 2) SERVER A CPE | REGISTER | 5060 |<------------------| 5060 ==> CT1 | 200 | 5060 |------------------>| 5060 | | | INVITE SDP(1) | 5060 |<------------------| 5060 | 300(multi choice) | 5060 |------------------>| 5060 SERVER B | ACK | 5060 |<------------------| 5060 | INVITE SDP(2) | 5060 |-------------------->| 5060 ==> CT2 | 100 | 5060 |<--------------------| 5060 | 200(contact changes)| 5060 |<--------------------| 5060 | ACK | 5060 |-------------------->| 50601 ==> CT3 | | |<--- RTP stream ---->| | | | BYE | 5060 |<--------------------| 50601 | 200 | 5060 |-------------------->| 50601 | INVITE SDP(3) | 5060 |<------------------| 5060 ==> CT1 CPE sends an INVITE request(1) to Server A, and creates a RTP&RTCP expect pair for this Conntrack 1 (CT1). Server A responds 300 to redirect to Server B. The RTP&RTCP expect pairs created on CT1 are removed upon 300 response. CPE sends the INVITE request(2) to Server B, and creates an expect pair for the new conntrack (due to destination address difference), let call CT2. Server B changes the port to 50601 in 200 OK response, and the following requests ACK and BYE from CPE are sent to 50601. The call is established. There is RTP stream and no RTCP stream. So RTP expect is removed and RTCP expect for CT2 retains. As BYE request is sent from port 50601, it is another conntrack, let call CT3, different from CT2 due to the port difference. So the BYE request will not remove the RTCP expect for CT2. Then another outgoing call is made, with the same RTP port being used (not definitely but possibly). CPE firstly sends the INVITE request(3) to Server A, and tries to create a RTP&RTCP expect pairs for this CT1. In current ALG implementation, the RTCP expect for CT1 fails in creation because it 'conflicts' with the residual one for CT2. As a result the INVITE request fails to send. Signed-off-by: xiao ruizhu Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso

netfilter: nf_tables: add hardware offload support

2019-07-09T21:38:51Z

This patch adds hardware offload support for nftables through the existing netdev_ops->ndo_setup_tc() interface, the TC_SETUP_CLSFLOWER classifier and the flow rule API. This hardware offload support is available for the NFPROTO_NETDEV family and the ingress hook. Each nftables expression has a new ->offload interface, that is used to populate the flow rule object that is attached to the transaction object. There is a new per-table NFT_TABLE_F_HW flag, that is set on to offload an entire table, including all of its chains. This patch supports for basic metadata (layer 3 and 4 protocol numbers), 5-tuple payload matching and the accept/drop actions; this also includes basechain hardware offload only. Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

netfilter: nft_meta: move bridge meta keys into nft_meta_bridge

2019-07-05T19:34:47Z

Separate bridge meta key from nft_meta to meta_bridge to avoid a dependency between the bridge module and nft_meta when using the bridge API available through include/linux/if_bridge.h Signed-off-by: wenxu Reviewed-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso

netfilter: nf_tables: Add synproxy support

2019-07-05T19:34:23Z

Add synproxy support for nf_tables. This behaves like the iptables synproxy target but it is structured in a way that allows us to propose improvements in the future. Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso

netfilter: nf_queue: remove unused hook entries pointer

2019-07-04T00:29:49Z

Its not used anywhere, so remove this. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next

2019-06-24T23:32:59Z

Resolve conflict between d2912cb15bdd ("treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 500") removing the GPL disclaimer and fe03d4745675 ("Update my email address") which updates Jozsef Kadlecsik's email. Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso