linux/ipc, branch v5.6

Revert "ipc,sem: remove uneeded sem_undo_list lock usage in exit_sem()"

2020-02-21T19:22:15Z

This reverts commit a97955844807e327df11aa33869009d14d6b7de0. Commit a97955844807 ("ipc,sem: remove uneeded sem_undo_list lock usage in exit_sem()") removes a lock that is needed. This leads to a process looping infinitely in exit_sem() and can also lead to a crash. There is a reproducer available in [1] and with the commit reverted the issue does not reproduce anymore. Using the reproducer found in [1] is fairly easy to reach a point where one of the child processes is looping infinitely in exit_sem between for(;;) and if (semid == -1) block, while it's trying to free its last sem_undo structure which has already been freed by freeary(). Each sem_undo struct is on two lists: one per semaphore set (list_id) and one per process (list_proc). The list_id list tracks undos by semaphore set, and the list_proc by process. Undo structures are removed either by freeary() or by exit_sem(). The freeary function is invoked when the user invokes a syscall to remove a semaphore set. During this operation freeary() traverses the list_id associated with the semaphore set and removes the undo structures from both the list_id and list_proc lists. For this case, exit_sem() is called at process exit. Each process contains a struct sem_undo_list (referred to as "ulp") which contains the head for the list_proc list. When the process exits, exit_sem() traverses this list to remove each sem_undo struct. As in freeary(), whenever a sem_undo struct is removed from list_proc, it is also removed from the list_id list. Removing elements from list_id is safe for both exit_sem() and freeary() due to sem_lock(). Removing elements from list_proc is not safe; freeary() locks &un->ulp->lock when it performs list_del_rcu(&un->list_proc) but exit_sem() does not (locking was removed by commit a97955844807 ("ipc,sem: remove uneeded sem_undo_list lock usage in exit_sem()"). This can result in the following situation while executing the reproducer [1] : Consider a child process in exit_sem() and the parent in freeary() (because of semctl(sid[i], NSEM, IPC_RMID)). - The list_proc for the child contains the last two undo structs A and B (the rest have been removed either by exit_sem() or freeary()). - The semid for A is 1 and semid for B is 2. - exit_sem() removes A and at the same time freeary() removes B. - Since A and B have different semid sem_lock() will acquire different locks for each process and both can proceed. The bug is that they remove A and B from the same list_proc at the same time because only freeary() acquires the ulp lock. When exit_sem() removes A it makes ulp->list_proc.next to point at B and at the same time freeary() removes B setting B->semid=-1. At the next iteration of for(;;) loop exit_sem() will try to remove B. The only way to break from for(;;) is for (&un->list_proc == &ulp->list_proc) to be true which is not. Then exit_sem() will check if B->semid=-1 which is and will continue looping in for(;;) until the memory for B is reallocated and the value at B->semid is changed. At that point, exit_sem() will crash attempting to unlink B from the lists (this can be easily triggered by running the reproducer [1] a second time). To prove this scenario instrumentation was added to keep information about each sem_undo (un) struct that is removed per process and per semaphore set (sma). CPU0 CPU1 [caller holds sem_lock(sma for A)] ... freeary() exit_sem() ... ... ... sem_lock(sma for B) spin_lock(A->ulp->lock) ... list_del_rcu(un_A->list_proc) list_del_rcu(un_B->list_proc) Undo structures A and B have different semid and sem_lock() operations proceed. However they belong to the same list_proc list and they are removed at the same time. This results into ulp->list_proc.next pointing to the address of B which is already removed. After reverting commit a97955844807 ("ipc,sem: remove uneeded sem_undo_list lock usage in exit_sem()") the issue was no longer reproducible. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1694779 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191211191318.11860-1-ioanna-maria.alifieraki@canonical.com Fixes: a97955844807 ("ipc,sem: remove uneeded sem_undo_list lock usage in exit_sem()") Signed-off-by: Ioanna Alifieraki Acked-by: Manfred Spraul Acked-by: Herton R. Krzesinski Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Cc: Joel Fernandes (Google) Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Jay Vosburgh Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

proc: convert everything to "struct proc_ops"

2020-02-04T03:05:26Z

The most notable change is DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE macro split in seq_file.h. Conversion rule is: llseek => proc_lseek unlocked_ioctl => proc_ioctl xxx => proc_xxx delete ".owner = THIS_MODULE" line [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix drivers/isdn/capi/kcapi_proc.c] [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: fix kernel/sched/psi.c] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200122180545.36222f50@canb.auug.org.au Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191225172546.GB13378@avx2 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ipc/msg.c: consolidate all xxxctl_down() functions

2020-02-04T03:05:24Z

A use of uninitialized memory in msgctl_down() because msqid64 in ksys_msgctl hasn't been initialized. The local | msqid64 | is created in ksys_msgctl() and then passed into msgctl_down(). Along the way msqid64 is never initialized before msgctl_down() checks msqid64->msg_qbytes. KUMSAN(KernelUninitializedMemorySantizer, a new error detection tool) reports: ================================================================== BUG: KUMSAN: use of uninitialized memory in msgctl_down+0x94/0x300 Read of size 8 at addr ffff88806bb97eb8 by task syz-executor707/2022 CPU: 0 PID: 2022 Comm: syz-executor707 Not tainted 5.2.0-rc4+ #63 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x75/0xae __kumsan_report+0x17c/0x3e6 kumsan_report+0xe/0x20 msgctl_down+0x94/0x300 ksys_msgctl.constprop.14+0xef/0x260 do_syscall_64+0x7e/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x4400e9 Code: 18 89 d0 c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 fb 13 fc ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 RSP: 002b:00007ffd869e0598 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000047 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000004002c8 RCX: 00000000004400e9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 00000000006ca018 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000ffffffff R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000401970 R13: 0000000000401a00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 The buggy address belongs to the page: page:ffffea0001aee5c0 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 flags: 0x100000000000000() raw: 0100000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff01ae0101 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kumsan: bad access detected ================================================================== Syzkaller reproducer: msgctl$IPC_RMID(0x0, 0x0) C reproducer: // autogenerated by syzkaller (https://github.com/google/syzkaller) int main(void) { syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20000000, 0x1000000, 3, 0x32, -1, 0); syscall(__NR_msgctl, 0, 0, 0); return 0; } [natechancellor@gmail.com: adjust indentation in ksys_msgctl] Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/829 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191218032932.37479-1-natechancellor@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190613014044.24234-1-shuaibinglu@126.com Signed-off-by: Lu Shuaibing Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Manfred Spraul Cc: NeilBrown From: Andrew Morton Subject: drivers/block/null_blk_main.c: fix layout Each line here overflows 80 cols by exactly one character. Delete one tab per line to fix. Cc: Shaohua Li Cc: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ipc/sem.c: document and update memory barriers

2020-02-04T03:05:24Z

Document and update the memory barriers in ipc/sem.c: - Add smp_store_release() to wake_up_sem_queue_prepare() and document why it is needed. - Read q->status using READ_ONCE+smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep(). as the pair for the barrier inside wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(). - Add comments to all barriers, and mention the rules in the block regarding locking. - Switch to using wake_q_add_safe(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191020123305.14715-6-manfred@colorfullife.com Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul Cc: Waiman Long Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: <1vier1@web.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ipc/msg.c: update and document memory barriers

2020-02-04T03:05:24Z

Transfer findings from ipc/mqueue.c: - A control barrier was missing for the lockless receive case So in theory, not yet initialized data may have been copied to user space - obviously only for architectures where control barriers are not NOP. - use smp_store_release(). In theory, the refount may have been decreased to 0 already when wake_q_add() tries to get a reference. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191020123305.14715-5-manfred@colorfullife.com Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul Cc: Waiman Long Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: <1vier1@web.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ipc/mqueue.c: update/document memory barriers

2020-02-04T03:05:23Z

Update and document memory barriers for mqueue.c: - ewp->state is read without any locks, thus READ_ONCE is required. - add smp_aquire__after_ctrl_dep() after the READ_ONCE, we need acquire semantics if the value is STATE_READY. - use wake_q_add_safe() - document why __set_current_state() may be used: Reading task->state cannot happen before the wake_q_add() call, which happens while holding info->lock. Thus the spin_unlock() is the RELEASE, and the spin_lock() is the ACQUIRE. For completeness: there is also a 3 CPU scenario, if the to be woken up task is already on another wake_q. Then: - CPU1: spin_unlock() of the task that goes to sleep is the RELEASE - CPU2: the spin_lock() of the waker is the ACQUIRE - CPU2: smp_mb__before_atomic inside wake_q_add() is the RELEASE - CPU3: smp_mb__after_spinlock() inside try_to_wake_up() is the ACQUIRE Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191020123305.14715-4-manfred@colorfullife.com Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Waiman Long Cc: <1vier1@web.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

ipc/mqueue.c: remove duplicated code

2020-02-04T03:05:23Z

pipelined_send() and pipelined_receive() are identical, so merge them. [manfred@colorfullife.com: add changelog] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191020123305.14715-3-manfred@colorfullife.com Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso Signed-off-by: Manfred Spraul Cc: <1vier1@web.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Waiman Long Cc: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

treewide: Use sizeof_field() macro

2019-12-09T18:36:44Z

Replace all the occurrences of FIELD_SIZEOF() with sizeof_field() except at places where these are defined. Later patches will remove the unused definition of FIELD_SIZEOF(). This patch is generated using following script: EXCLUDE_FILES="include/linux/stddef.h|include/linux/kernel.h" git grep -l -e "\bFIELD_SIZEOF\b" | while read file; do if [[ "$file" =~ $EXCLUDE_FILES ]]; then continue fi sed -i -e 's/\bFIELD_SIZEOF\b/sizeof_field/g' $file; done Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190924105839.110713-3-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com Co-developed-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Acked-by: David Miller # for net

y2038: remove CONFIG_64BIT_TIME

2019-11-15T13:38:27Z

The CONFIG_64BIT_TIME option is defined on all architectures, and can be removed for simplicity now. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann

ipc/sem.c: convert to use built-in RCU list checking

2019-09-26T00:51:41Z

CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST requires list_for_each_entry_rcu() to pass a lockdep expression if using srcu or locking for protection. It can only check regular RCU protection, all other protection needs to be passed as lockdep expression. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190830231817.76862-2-joel@joelfernandes.org Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Cc: Jonathan Derrick Cc: Keith Busch Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds