linux/kernel/bpf/core.c, branch v4.14

bpf: fix bpf_tail_call() x64 JIT

2017-10-03T23:04:44Z

- bpf prog_array just like all other types of bpf array accepts 32-bit index. Clarify that in the comment. - fix x64 JIT of bpf_tail_call which was incorrectly loading 8 instead of 4 bytes - tighten corresponding check in the interpreter to stay consistent The JIT bug can be triggered after introduction of BPF_F_NUMA_NODE flag in commit 96eabe7a40aa in 4.14. Before that the map_flags would stay zero and though JIT code is wrong it will check bounds correctly. Hence two fixes tags. All other JITs don't have this problem. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Fixes: 96eabe7a40aa ("bpf: Allow selecting numa node during map creation") Fixes: b52f00e6a715 ("x86: bpf_jit: implement bpf_tail_call() helper") Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: sock_map fixes for !CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL and !STREAM_PARSER

2017-08-16T22:34:13Z

Resolve issues with !CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL and !STREAM_PARSER net/core/filter.c: In function ‘do_sk_redirect_map’: net/core/filter.c:1881:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__sock_map_lookup_elem’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] sk = __sock_map_lookup_elem(ri->map, ri->ifindex); ^ net/core/filter.c:1881:6: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast [enabled by default] sk = __sock_map_lookup_elem(ri->map, ri->ifindex); Fixes: 174a79ff9515 ("bpf: sockmap with sk redirect support") Reported-by: Eric Dumazet Signed-off-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: add BPF_J{LT,LE,SLT,SLE} instructions

2017-08-09T23:53:56Z

Currently, eBPF only understands BPF_JGT (>), BPF_JGE (>=), BPF_JSGT (s>), BPF_JSGE (s>=) instructions, this means that particularly *JLT/*JLE counterparts involving immediates need to be rewritten from e.g. X < [IMM] by swapping arguments into [IMM] > X, meaning the immediate first is required to be loaded into a register Y := [IMM], such that then we can compare with Y > X. Note that the destination operand is always required to be a register. This has the downside of having unnecessarily increased register pressure, meaning complex program would need to spill other registers temporarily to stack in order to obtain an unused register for the [IMM]. Loading to registers will thus also affect state pruning since we need to account for that register use and potentially those registers that had to be spilled/filled again. As a consequence slightly more stack space might have been used due to spilling, and BPF programs are a bit longer due to extra code involving the register load and potentially required spill/fills. Thus, add BPF_JLT (<), BPF_JLE (<=), BPF_JSLT (s<), BPF_JSLE (s<=) counterparts to the eBPF instruction set. Modifying LLVM to remove the NegateCC() workaround in a PoC patch at [1] and allowing it to also emit the new instructions resulted in cilium's BPF programs that are injected into the fast-path to have a reduced program length in the range of 2-3% (e.g. accumulated main and tail call sections from one of the object file reduced from 4864 to 4729 insns), reduced complexity in the range of 10-30% (e.g. accumulated sections reduced in one of the cases from 116432 to 88428 insns), and reduced stack usage in the range of 1-5% (e.g. accumulated sections from one of the object files reduced from 824 to 784b). The modification for LLVM will be incorporated in a backwards compatible way. Plan is for LLVM to have i) a target specific option to offer a possibility to explicitly enable the extension by the user (as we have with -m target specific extensions today for various CPU insns), and ii) have the kernel checked for presence of the extensions and enable them transparently when the user is selecting more aggressive options such as -march=native in a bpf target context. (Other frontends generating BPF byte code, e.g. ply can probe the kernel directly for its code generation.) [1] https://github.com/borkmann/llvm/tree/bpf-insns Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: Fix out-of-bound access on interpreters[]

2017-06-29T19:37:04Z

The index is off-by-one when fp->aux->stack_depth has already been rounded up to 32. In particular, if stack_depth is 512, the index will be 16. The fix is to round_up and then takes -1 instead of round_down. [ 22.318680] ================================================================== [ 22.319745] BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x48a/0x670 [ 22.320737] Read of size 8 at addr ffffffff82aadae0 by task sockex3/1946 [ 22.321646] [ 22.321858] CPU: 1 PID: 1946 Comm: sockex3 Tainted: G W 4.12.0-rc6-01680-g2ee87db3a287 #22 [ 22.323061] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-1.el7.centos 04/01/2014 [ 22.324260] Call Trace: [ 22.324612] dump_stack+0x67/0x99 [ 22.325081] print_address_description+0x1e8/0x290 [ 22.325734] ? bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x48a/0x670 [ 22.326360] kasan_report+0x265/0x350 [ 22.326860] __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x19/0x20 [ 22.327484] bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x48a/0x670 [ 22.328109] bpf_prog_load+0x626/0xd40 [ 22.328637] ? __bpf_prog_charge+0xc0/0xc0 [ 22.329222] ? check_nnp_nosuid.isra.61+0x100/0x100 [ 22.329890] ? __might_fault+0xf6/0x1b0 [ 22.330446] ? lock_acquire+0x360/0x360 [ 22.331013] SyS_bpf+0x67c/0x24d0 [ 22.331491] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10 [ 22.332049] ? __getnstimeofday64+0xaf/0x1c0 [ 22.332635] ? bpf_prog_get+0x20/0x20 [ 22.333135] ? __audit_syscall_entry+0x300/0x600 [ 22.333770] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x540/0xdd0 [ 22.334339] ? exit_to_usermode_loop+0xe0/0xe0 [ 22.334950] ? do_syscall_64+0x48/0x410 [ 22.335446] ? bpf_prog_get+0x20/0x20 [ 22.335954] do_syscall_64+0x181/0x410 [ 22.336454] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 [ 22.337121] RIP: 0033:0x7f263fe81f19 [ 22.337618] RSP: 002b:00007ffd9a3440c8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141 [ 22.338619] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000aac5fb RCX: 00007f263fe81f19 [ 22.339600] RDX: 0000000000000030 RSI: 00007ffd9a3440d0 RDI: 0000000000000005 [ 22.340470] RBP: 0000000000a9a1e0 R08: 0000000000a9a1e0 R09: 0000009d00000001 [ 22.341430] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000010000 [ 22.342411] R13: 0000000000a9a023 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000003 [ 22.343369] [ 22.343593] The buggy address belongs to the variable: [ 22.344241] interpreters+0x80/0x980 [ 22.344708] [ 22.344908] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 22.345556] ffffffff82aad980: 00 00 00 04 fa fa fa fa 04 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa [ 22.346449] ffffffff82aada00: 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 [ 22.347361] >ffffffff82aada80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 fa fa fa fa [ 22.348301] ^ [ 22.349142] ffffffff82aadb00: 00 01 fa fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 [ 22.350058] ffffffff82aadb80: 00 00 07 fa fa fa fa fa 00 00 05 fa fa fa fa fa [ 22.350984] ================================================================== Fixes: b870aa901f4b ("bpf: use different interpreter depending on required stack size") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: use different interpreter depending on required stack size

2017-05-31T23:29:48Z

16 __bpf_prog_run() interpreters for various stack sizes add .text but not a lot comparing to run-time stack savings text data bss dec hex filename 26350 10328 624 37302 91b6 kernel/bpf/core.o.before_split 25777 10328 624 36729 8f79 kernel/bpf/core.o.after_split 26970 10328 624 37922 9422 kernel/bpf/core.o.now Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: split bpf core interpreter

2017-05-31T23:29:47Z

split __bpf_prog_run() interpreter into stack allocation and execution parts. The code section shrinks which helps interpreter performance in some cases. text data bss dec hex filename 26350 10328 624 37302 91b6 kernel/bpf/core.o.before 25777 10328 624 36729 8f79 kernel/bpf/core.o.after Very short programs got slower (due to extra function call): Before: test_bpf: #89 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2 = 3 jited:0 7 PASS test_bpf: #90 ALU64_ADD_K: 3 + 0 = 3 jited:0 8 PASS test_bpf: #91 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2147483646 = 2147483647 jited:0 7 PASS test_bpf: #92 ALU64_ADD_K: 4294967294 + 2 = 4294967296 jited:0 11 PASS test_bpf: #93 ALU64_ADD_K: 2147483646 + -2147483647 = -1 jited:0 7 PASS After: test_bpf: #89 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2 = 3 jited:0 11 PASS test_bpf: #90 ALU64_ADD_K: 3 + 0 = 3 jited:0 11 PASS test_bpf: #91 ALU64_ADD_K: 1 + 2147483646 = 2147483647 jited:0 11 PASS test_bpf: #92 ALU64_ADD_K: 4294967294 + 2 = 4294967296 jited:0 14 PASS test_bpf: #93 ALU64_ADD_K: 2147483646 + -2147483647 = -1 jited:0 10 PASS Longer programs got faster: Before: test_bpf: #266 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:0 20286 20513 PASS test_bpf: #267 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:0 31853 31768 PASS test_bpf: #268 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:0 9815 PASS test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:0 6 PASS test_bpf: #270 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 13959 PASS test_bpf: #271 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... jited:0 210 PASS test_bpf: #272 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:0 21724 PASS test_bpf: #273 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+vlan_push/pop jited:0 19118 PASS After: test_bpf: #266 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:0 19008 18827 PASS test_bpf: #267 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:0 29238 28450 PASS test_bpf: #268 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:0 9485 PASS test_bpf: #269 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump backwards jited:0 12 PASS test_bpf: #270 BPF_MAXINSNS: Edge hopping nuthouse jited:0 13257 PASS test_bpf: #271 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump, gap, jump, ... jited:0 213 PASS test_bpf: #272 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+get_processor_id jited:0 19389 PASS test_bpf: #273 BPF_MAXINSNS: ld_abs+vlan_push/pop jited:0 19583 PASS For real world production programs the difference is noise. This patch is first step towards reducing interpreter stack consumption. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: free up BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL | BPF_X opcode

2017-05-31T23:29:47Z

free up BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL | BPF_X opcode to be used by actual indirect call by register and use kernel internal opcode to mark call instruction into bpf_tail_call() helper. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

mm, vmalloc: use __GFP_HIGHMEM implicitly

2017-05-09T00:15:13Z

__vmalloc* allows users to provide gfp flags for the underlying allocation. This API is quite popular $ git grep "=[[:space:]]__vmalloc\|return[[:space:]]*__vmalloc" | wc -l 77 The only problem is that many people are not aware that they really want to give __GFP_HIGHMEM along with other flags because there is really no reason to consume precious lowmemory on CONFIG_HIGHMEM systems for pages which are mapped to the kernel vmalloc space. About half of users don't use this flag, though. This signals that we make the API unnecessarily too complex. This patch simply uses __GFP_HIGHMEM implicitly when allocating pages to be mapped to the vmalloc space. Current users which add __GFP_HIGHMEM are simplified and drop the flag. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170307141020.29107-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Al Viro Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Cristopher Lameter Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

bpf: bpf_lock on kallsysms doesn't need to be irqsave

2017-04-28T19:48:14Z

Hannes rightfully spotted that the bpf_lock doesn't need to be irqsave variant. We never perform any such updates where this would be necessary (neither right now nor in future), therefore relax this further. Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller

bpf: reference may_access_skb() from __bpf_prog_run()

2017-04-11T14:54:27Z

It took me quite some time to figure out how this was linked, so in order to save the next person the effort of finding it add a comment in __bpf_prog_run() that indicates what exactly determines that a program can access the ctx == skb. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller