linux/kernel/bpf/syscall.c, branch v6.8

bpf: Fix re-attachment branch in bpf_tracing_prog_attach

2024-01-05T04:40:19Z

The following case can cause a crash due to missing attach_btf: 1) load rawtp program 2) load fentry program with rawtp as target_fd 3) create tracing link for fentry program with target_fd = 0 4) repeat 3 In the end we have: - prog->aux->dst_trampoline == NULL - tgt_prog == NULL (because we did not provide target_fd to link_create) - prog->aux->attach_btf == NULL (the program was loaded with attach_prog_fd=X) - the program was loaded for tgt_prog but we have no way to find out which one BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000058 Call Trace: ? __die+0x20/0x70 ? page_fault_oops+0x15b/0x430 ? fixup_exception+0x22/0x330 ? exc_page_fault+0x6f/0x170 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? bpf_tracing_prog_attach+0x279/0x560 ? btf_obj_id+0x5/0x10 bpf_tracing_prog_attach+0x439/0x560 __sys_bpf+0x1cf4/0x2de0 __x64_sys_bpf+0x1c/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x41/0xf0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76 Return -EINVAL in this situation. Fixes: f3a95075549e0 ("bpf: Allow trampoline re-attach for tracing and lsm programs") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Acked-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240103190559.14750-4-9erthalion6@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Relax tracing prog recursive attach rules

2024-01-05T04:31:34Z

Currently, it's not allowed to attach an fentry/fexit prog to another one fentry/fexit. At the same time it's not uncommon to see a tracing program with lots of logic in use, and the attachment limitation prevents usage of fentry/fexit for performance analysis (e.g. with "bpftool prog profile" command) in this case. An example could be falcosecurity libs project that uses tp_btf tracing programs. Following the corresponding discussion [1], the reason for that is to avoid tracing progs call cycles without introducing more complex solutions. But currently it seems impossible to load and attach tracing programs in a way that will form such a cycle. The limitation is coming from the fact that attach_prog_fd is specified at the prog load (thus making it impossible to attach to a program loaded after it in this way), as well as tracing progs not implementing link_detach. Replace "no same type" requirement with verification that no more than one level of attachment nesting is allowed. In this way only one fentry/fexit program could be attached to another fentry/fexit to cover profiling use case, and still no cycle could be formed. To implement, add a new field into bpf_prog_aux to track nested attachment for tracing programs. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191108064039.2041889-16-ast@kernel.org/ Acked-by: Jiri Olsa Acked-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240103190559.14750-2-9erthalion6@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

Revert BPF token-related functionality

2023-12-19T16:23:03Z

This patch includes the following revert (one conflicting BPF FS patch and three token patch sets, represented by merge commits): - revert 0f5d5454c723 "Merge branch 'bpf-fs-mount-options-parsing-follow-ups'"; - revert 750e785796bb "bpf: Support uid and gid when mounting bpffs"; - revert 733763285acf "Merge branch 'bpf-token-support-in-libbpf-s-bpf-object'"; - revert c35919dcce28 "Merge branch 'bpf-token-and-bpf-fs-based-delegation'". Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAHk-=wg7JuFYwGy=GOMbRCtOL+jwSQsdUaBsRWkDVYbxipbM5A@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko

bpf: Fix a race condition between btf_put() and map_free()

2023-12-15T01:10:32Z

When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel, I once hit a kasan error like below: [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830 [ 1887.186498] [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494 [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 1887.190341] Call Trace: [ 1887.190666] [ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0 [ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0 [ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0 [ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720 [ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120 [ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100 [ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0 [ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0 [ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0 [ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40 [ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260 [ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0 [ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890 [ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0 [ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0 [ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0 [ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 1887.204913] [ 1887.204913] [ 1887.205209] [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197: [ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80 [ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0 [ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480 [ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670 [ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0 [ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600 [ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50 [ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0 [ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b [ 1887.210868] [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36: [ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60 [ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40 [ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180 [ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210 [ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130 [ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0 [ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0: 00000000000034c0 : ; { 34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64 34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 34c9: 55 pushq %rbp 34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp ... ; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 && 36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13 36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi 36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <==== kasan function 36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d <==== use-after-free load 36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d 36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above. I did some source code analysis and find the reason. CPU A CPU B bpf_map_put: ... btf_put with rcu callback ... bpf_map_free_deferred with system_unbound_wq ... ... ... ... btf_free_rcu: ... ... ... bpf_map_free_deferred: ... ... ... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free() ... | race condition ... ... ---------> map->ops->map_free() ... ... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls: ... __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false); ... Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code: meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id); if (!meta) return -EFAULT; rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record; So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab. And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here. Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which significantly increased reproducibility. diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work) struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work); struct btf_record *rec = map->record; + mdelay(100); security_bpf_map_free(map); bpf_map_release_memcg(map); /* implementation dependent freeing */ Hao also provided test cases ([1]) for easily reproducing the above issue. There are two ways to fix the issue, the v1 of the patch ([2]) moving btf_put() after map_free callback, and the v5 of the patch ([3]) using a kptr style fix which tries to get a btf reference during map_check_btf(). Each approach has its pro and cons. The first approach delays freeing btf while the second approach needs to acquire reference depending on context which makes logic not very elegant and may complicate things with future new data structures. Alexei suggested in [4] going back to v1 which is what this patch tries to do. Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple of times and didn't observe the error for the above rb_root test cases. Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231207141500.917136-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/ [2] v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231204173946.3066377-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ [3] v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208041621.2968241-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ [4] v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJ3FiXUhZJwX_81sjZvSYYKCFB3BT6P8D59RS2Gu+0Z7g@mail.gmail.com/ Cc: Hou Tao Fixes: 958cf2e273f0 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214203815.1469107-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Reduce the scope of rcu_read_lock when updating fd map

2023-12-14T04:49:11Z

There is no rcu-read-lock requirement for ops->map_fd_get_ptr() or ops->map_fd_put_ptr(), so doesn't use rcu-read-lock for these two callbacks. For bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem(), accessing array->ptrs doesn't need rcu-read-lock because array->ptrs must still be allocated. For bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem(), htab_map_update_elem() only requires rcu-read-lock to be held to avoid the WARN_ON_ONCE(), so only use rcu_read_lock() during the invocation of htab_map_update_elem(). Acked-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214043010.3458072-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Update the comments in maybe_wait_bpf_programs()

2023-12-14T01:01:42Z

Since commit 638e4b825d52 ("bpf: Allows per-cpu maps and map-in-map in sleepable programs"), sleepable BPF program can also use map-in-map, but maybe_wait_bpf_programs() doesn't handle it accordingly. The main reason is that using synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace() to wait for the completions of these sleepable BPF programs may incur a very long delay and userspace may think it is hung, so the wait for sleepable BPF programs is skipped. Update the comments in maybe_wait_bpf_programs() to reflect the reason. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Acked-by: Yonghong Song Acked-by: John Fastabend Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211083447.1921178-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Set uattr->batch.count as zero before batched update or deletion

2023-12-10T02:12:34Z

generic_map_{delete,update}_batch() doesn't set uattr->batch.count as zero before it tries to allocate memory for key. If the memory allocation fails, the value of uattr->batch.count will be incorrect. Fix it by setting uattr->batch.count as zero beore batched update or deletion. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-6-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Only call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() when map operation succeeds

2023-12-10T02:12:34Z

There is no need to call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() if update or deletion operation fails. So only call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() if update or deletion operation succeeds. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Add missed maybe_wait_bpf_programs() for htab of maps

2023-12-10T02:12:34Z

When doing batched lookup and deletion operations on htab of maps, maybe_wait_bpf_programs() is needed to ensure all programs don't use the inner map after the bpf syscall returns. Instead of adding the wait in __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(), adding the wait in bpf_map_do_batch() and also removing the calling of maybe_wait_bpf_programs() from generic_map_{delete,update}_batch(). Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() only once for generic_map_update_batch()

2023-12-10T02:12:33Z

Just like commit 9087c6ff8dfe ("bpf: Call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() only once from generic_map_delete_batch()"), there is also no need to call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() for each update in batched update, so only call it once in generic_map_update_batch(). Signed-off-by: Hou Tao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov