linux/kernel/bpf/verifier.c, branch v5.0

bpf: fix sanitation rewrite in case of non-pointers

2019-03-02T05:24:08Z

Marek reported that he saw an issue with the below snippet in that timing measurements where off when loaded as unpriv while results were reasonable when loaded as privileged: [...] uint64_t a = bpf_ktime_get_ns(); uint64_t b = bpf_ktime_get_ns(); uint64_t delta = b - a; if ((int64_t)delta > 0) { [...] Turns out there is a bug where a corner case is missing in the fix d3bd7413e0ca ("bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar type from different paths"), namely fixup_bpf_calls() only checks whether aux has a non-zero alu_state, but it also needs to test for the case of BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER since in both occasions we need to skip the masking rewrite (as there is nothing to mask). Fixes: d3bd7413e0ca ("bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar type from different paths") Reported-by: Marek Majkowski Reported-by: Arthur Fabre Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAJPywTJqP34cK20iLM5YmUMz9KXQOdu1-+BZrGMAGgLuBWz7fg@mail.gmail.com/T/ Acked-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Fix narrow load on a bpf_sock returned from sk_lookup()

2019-02-10T03:57:22Z

By adding this test to test_verifier: { "reference tracking: access sk->src_ip4 (narrow load)", .insns = { BPF_SK_LOOKUP, BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4) + 2), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_release), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, }, The above test loads 2 bytes from sk->src_ip4 where sk is obtained by bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(). It hits an internal verifier error from convert_ctx_accesses(): [root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_verifier 665 665 Failed to load prog 'Invalid argument'! 0: (b7) r2 = 0 1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = r2 2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r2 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -24) = r2 4: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -32) = r2 5: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -40) = r2 6: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -48) = r2 7: (bf) r2 = r10 8: (07) r2 += -48 9: (b7) r3 = 36 10: (b7) r4 = 0 11: (b7) r5 = 0 12: (85) call bpf_sk_lookup_tcp#84 13: (bf) r6 = r0 14: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+3 R0=sock(id=1,off=0,imm=0) R6=sock(id=1,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????0000 fp-16=0000mmmm fp-24=mmmmmmmm fp-32=mmmmmmmm fp-40=mmmmmmmm fp-48=mmmmmmmm refs=1 15: (69) r2 = *(u16 *)(r0 +26) 16: (bf) r1 = r6 17: (85) call bpf_sk_release#86 18: (95) exit from 14 to 18: safe processed 20 insns (limit 131072), stack depth 48 bpf verifier is misconfigured Summary: 0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED The bpf_sock_is_valid_access() is expecting src_ip4 can be narrowly loaded (meaning load any 1 or 2 bytes of the src_ip4) by marking info->ctx_field_size. However, this marked ctx_field_size is not used. This patch fixes it. Due to the recent refactoring in test_verifier, this new test will be added to the bpf-next branch (together with the bpf_tcp_sock patchset) to avoid merge conflict. Fixes: c64b7983288e ("bpf: Add PTR_TO_SOCKET verifier type") Cc: Joe Stringer Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Acked-by: Joe Stringer Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar type from different paths

2019-01-06T05:32:38Z

While 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic") took care of rejecting alu op on pointer when e.g. pointer came from two different map values with different map properties such as value size, Jann reported that a case was not covered yet when a given alu op is used in both "ptr_reg += reg" and "numeric_reg += reg" from different branches where we would incorrectly try to sanitize based on the pointer's limit. Catch this corner case and reject the program instead. Fixes: 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic") Reported-by: Jann Horn Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic

2019-01-03T00:01:24Z

Jann reported that the original commit back in b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") was not sufficient to stop CPU from speculating out of bounds memory access: While b2157399cc98 only focussed on masking array map access for unprivileged users for tail calls and data access such that the user provided index gets sanitized from BPF program and syscall side, there is still a more generic form affected from BPF programs that applies to most maps that hold user data in relation to dynamic map access when dealing with unknown scalars or "slow" known scalars as access offset, for example: - Load a map value pointer into R6 - Load an index into R7 - Do a slow computation (e.g. with a memory dependency) that loads a limit into R8 (e.g. load the limit from a map for high latency, then mask it to make the verifier happy) - Exit if R7 >= R8 (mispredicted branch) - Load R0 = R6[R7] - Load R0 = R6[R0] For unknown scalars there are two options in the BPF verifier where we could derive knowledge from in order to guarantee safe access to the memory: i) While /<=/>= variants won't allow to derive any lower or upper bounds from the unknown scalar where it would be safe to add it to the map value pointer, it is possible through ==/!= test however. ii) another option is to transform the unknown scalar into a known scalar, for example, through ALU ops combination such as R &= followed by R |= or any similar combination where the original information from the unknown scalar would be destroyed entirely leaving R with a constant. The initial slow load still precedes the latter ALU ops on that register, so the CPU executes speculatively from that point. Once we have the known scalar, any compare operation would work then. A third option only involving registers with known scalars could be crafted as described in [0] where a CPU port (e.g. Slow Int unit) would be filled with many dependent computations such that the subsequent condition depending on its outcome has to wait for evaluation on its execution port and thereby executing speculatively if the speculated code can be scheduled on a different execution port, or any other form of mistraining as described in [1], for example. Given this is not limited to only unknown scalars, not only map but also stack access is affected since both is accessible for unprivileged users and could potentially be used for out of bounds access under speculation. In order to prevent any of these cases, the verifier is now sanitizing pointer arithmetic on the offset such that any out of bounds speculation would be masked in a way where the pointer arithmetic result in the destination register will stay unchanged, meaning offset masked into zero similar as in array_index_nospec() case. With regards to implementation, there are three options that were considered: i) new insn for sanitation, ii) push/pop insn and sanitation as inlined BPF, iii) reuse of ax register and sanitation as inlined BPF. Option i) has the downside that we end up using from reserved bits in the opcode space, but also that we would require each JIT to emit masking as native arch opcodes meaning mitigation would have slow adoption till everyone implements it eventually which is counter-productive. Option ii) and iii) have both in common that a temporary register is needed in order to implement the sanitation as inlined BPF since we are not allowed to modify the source register. While a push / pop insn in ii) would be useful to have in any case, it requires once again that every JIT needs to implement it first. While possible, amount of changes needed would also be unsuitable for a -stable patch. Therefore, the path which has fewer changes, less BPF instructions for the mitigation and does not require anything to be changed in the JITs is option iii) which this work is pursuing. The ax register is already mapped to a register in all JITs (modulo arm32 where it's mapped to stack as various other BPF registers there) and used in constant blinding for JITs-only so far. It can be reused for verifier rewrites under certain constraints. The interpreter's tmp "register" has therefore been remapped into extending the register set with hidden ax register and reusing that for a number of instructions that needed the prior temporary variable internally (e.g. div, mod). This allows for zero increase in stack space usage in the interpreter, and enables (restricted) generic use in rewrites otherwise as long as such a patchlet does not make use of these instructions. The sanitation mask is dynamic and relative to the offset the map value or stack pointer currently holds. There are various cases that need to be taken under consideration for the masking, e.g. such operation could look as follows: ptr += val or val += ptr or ptr -= val. Thus, the value to be sanitized could reside either in source or in destination register, and the limit is different depending on whether the ALU op is addition or subtraction and depending on the current known and bounded offset. The limit is derived as follows: limit := max_value_size - (smin_value + off). For subtraction: limit := umax_value + off. This holds because we do not allow any pointer arithmetic that would temporarily go out of bounds or would have an unknown value with mixed signed bounds where it is unclear at verification time whether the actual runtime value would be either negative or positive. For example, we have a derived map pointer value with constant offset and bounded one, so limit based on smin_value works because the verifier requires that statically analyzed arithmetic on the pointer must be in bounds, and thus it checks if resulting smin_value + off and umax_value + off is still within map value bounds at time of arithmetic in addition to time of access. Similarly, for the case of stack access we derive the limit as follows: MAX_BPF_STACK + off for subtraction and -off for the case of addition where off := ptr_reg->off + ptr_reg->var_off.value. Subtraction is a special case for the masking which can be in form of ptr += -val, ptr -= -val, or ptr -= val. In the first two cases where we know that the value is negative, we need to temporarily negate the value in order to do the sanitation on a positive value where we later swap the ALU op, and restore original source register if the value was in source. The sanitation of pointer arithmetic alone is still not fully sufficient as is, since a scenario like the following could happen ... PTR += 0x1000 (e.g. K-based imm) PTR -= BIG_NUMBER_WITH_SLOW_COMPARISON PTR += 0x1000 PTR -= BIG_NUMBER_WITH_SLOW_COMPARISON [...] ... which under speculation could end up as ... PTR += 0x1000 PTR -= 0 [ truncated by mitigation ] PTR += 0x1000 PTR -= 0 [ truncated by mitigation ] [...] ... and therefore still access out of bounds. To prevent such case, the verifier is also analyzing safety for potential out of bounds access under speculative execution. Meaning, it is also simulating pointer access under truncation. We therefore "branch off" and push the current verification state after the ALU operation with known 0 to the verification stack for later analysis. Given the current path analysis succeeded it is likely that the one under speculation can be pruned. In any case, it is also subject to existing complexity limits and therefore anything beyond this point will be rejected. In terms of pruning, it needs to be ensured that the verification state from speculative execution simulation must never prune a non-speculative execution path, therefore, we mark verifier state accordingly at the time of push_stack(). If verifier detects out of bounds access under speculative execution from one of the possible paths that includes a truncation, it will reject such program. Given we mask every reg-based pointer arithmetic for unprivileged programs, we've been looking into how it could affect real-world programs in terms of size increase. As the majority of programs are targeted for privileged-only use case, we've unconditionally enabled masking (with its alu restrictions on top of it) for privileged programs for the sake of testing in order to check i) whether they get rejected in its current form, and ii) by how much the number of instructions and size will increase. We've tested this by using Katran, Cilium and test_l4lb from the kernel selftests. For Katran we've evaluated balancer_kern.o, Cilium bpf_lxc.o and an older test object bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o and l4lb we've used test_l4lb.o as well as test_l4lb_noinline.o. We found that none of the programs got rejected by the verifier with this change, and that impact is rather minimal to none. balancer_kern.o had 13,904 bytes (1,738 insns) xlated and 7,797 bytes JITed before and after the change. Most complex program in bpf_lxc.o had 30,544 bytes (3,817 insns) xlated and 18,538 bytes JITed before and after and none of the other tail call programs in bpf_lxc.o had any changes either. For the older bpf_lxc_opt_-DUNKNOWN.o object we found a small increase from 20,616 bytes (2,576 insns) and 12,536 bytes JITed before to 20,664 bytes (2,582 insns) and 12,558 bytes JITed after the change. Other programs from that object file had similar small increase. Both test_l4lb.o had no change and remained at 6,544 bytes (817 insns) xlated and 3,401 bytes JITed and for test_l4lb_noinline.o constant at 5,080 bytes (634 insns) xlated and 3,313 bytes JITed. This can be explained in that LLVM typically optimizes stack based pointer arithmetic by using K-based operations and that use of dynamic map access is not overly frequent. However, in future we may decide to optimize the algorithm further under known guarantees from branch and value speculation. Latter seems also unclear in terms of prediction heuristics that today's CPUs apply as well as whether there could be collisions in e.g. the predictor's Value History/Pattern Table for triggering out of bounds access, thus masking is performed unconditionally at this point but could be subject to relaxation later on. We were generally also brainstorming various other approaches for mitigation, but the blocker was always lack of available registers at runtime and/or overhead for runtime tracking of limits belonging to a specific pointer. Thus, we found this to be minimally intrusive under given constraints. With that in place, a simple example with sanitized access on unprivileged load at post-verification time looks as follows: # bpftool prog dump xlated id 282 [...] 28: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r7 +0) 29: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r7 +8) 30: (57) r1 &= 15 31: (79) r3 = *(u64 *)(r0 +4608) 32: (57) r3 &= 1 33: (47) r3 |= 1 34: (2d) if r2 > r3 goto pc+19 35: (b4) (u32) r11 = (u32) 20479 | 36: (1f) r11 -= r2 | Dynamic sanitation for pointer 37: (4f) r11 |= r2 | arithmetic with registers 38: (87) r11 = -r11 | containing bounded or known 39: (c7) r11 s>>= 63 | scalars in order to prevent 40: (5f) r11 &= r2 | out of bounds speculation. 41: (0f) r4 += r11 | 42: (71) r4 = *(u8 *)(r4 +0) 43: (6f) r4 <<= r1 [...] For the case where the scalar sits in the destination register as opposed to the source register, the following code is emitted for the above example: [...] 16: (b4) (u32) r11 = (u32) 20479 17: (1f) r11 -= r2 18: (4f) r11 |= r2 19: (87) r11 = -r11 20: (c7) r11 s>>= 63 21: (5f) r2 &= r11 22: (0f) r2 += r0 23: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r2 +0) [...] JIT blinding example with non-conflicting use of r10: [...] d5: je 0x0000000000000106 _ d7: mov 0x0(%rax),%edi | da: mov $0xf153246,%r10d | Index load from map value and e0: xor $0xf153259,%r10 | (const blinded) mask with 0x1f. e7: and %r10,%rdi |_ ea: mov $0x2f,%r10d | f0: sub %rdi,%r10 | Sanitized addition. Both use r10 f3: or %rdi,%r10 | but do not interfere with each f6: neg %r10 | other. (Neither do these instructions f9: sar $0x3f,%r10 | interfere with the use of ax as temp fd: and %r10,%rdi | in interpreter.) 100: add %rax,%rdi |_ 103: mov 0x0(%rdi),%eax [...] Tested that it fixes Jann's reproducer, and also checked that test_verifier and test_progs suite with interpreter, JIT and JIT with hardening enabled on x86-64 and arm64 runs successfully. [0] Speculose: Analyzing the Security Implications of Speculative Execution in CPUs, Giorgi Maisuradze and Christian Rossow, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.04084.pdf [1] A Systematic Evaluation of Transient Execution Attacks and Defenses, Claudio Canella, Jo Van Bulck, Michael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp, Benjamin von Berg, Philipp Ortner, Frank Piessens, Dmitry Evtyushkin, Daniel Gruss, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.05441.pdf Fixes: b2157399cc98 ("bpf: prevent out-of-bounds speculation") Reported-by: Jann Horn Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: fix check_map_access smin_value test when pointer contains offset

2019-01-03T00:01:24Z

In check_map_access() we probe actual bounds through __check_map_access() with offset of reg->smin_value + off for lower bound and offset of reg->umax_value + off for the upper bound. However, even though the reg->smin_value could have a negative value, the final result of the sum with off could be positive when pointer arithmetic with known and unknown scalars is combined. In this case we reject the program with an error such as "R min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check." even though the access itself would be fine. Therefore extend the check to probe whether the actual resulting reg->smin_value + off is less than zero. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: restrict unknown scalars of mixed signed bounds for unprivileged

2019-01-03T00:01:24Z

For unknown scalars of mixed signed bounds, meaning their smin_value is negative and their smax_value is positive, we need to reject arithmetic with pointer to map value. For unprivileged the goal is to mask every map pointer arithmetic and this cannot reliably be done when it is unknown at verification time whether the scalar value is negative or positive. Given this is a corner case, the likelihood of breaking should be very small. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: restrict stack pointer arithmetic for unprivileged

2019-01-03T00:01:24Z

Restrict stack pointer arithmetic for unprivileged users in that arithmetic itself must not go out of bounds as opposed to the actual access later on. Therefore after each adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() with a stack pointer as a destination we simulate a check_stack_access() of 1 byte on the destination and once that fails the program is rejected for unprivileged program loads. This is analog to map value pointer arithmetic and needed for masking later on. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: restrict map value pointer arithmetic for unprivileged

2019-01-03T00:01:24Z

Restrict map value pointer arithmetic for unprivileged users in that arithmetic itself must not go out of bounds as opposed to the actual access later on. Therefore after each adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() with a map value pointer as a destination it will simulate a check_map_access() of 1 byte on the destination and once that fails the program is rejected for unprivileged program loads. We use this later on for masking any pointer arithmetic with the remainder of the map value space. The likelihood of breaking any existing real-world unprivileged eBPF program is very small for this corner case. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: move {prev_,}insn_idx into verifier env

2019-01-03T00:01:24Z

Move prev_insn_idx and insn_idx from the do_check() function into the verifier environment, so they can be read inside the various helper functions for handling the instructions. It's easier to put this into the environment rather than changing all call-sites only to pass it along. insn_idx is useful in particular since this later on allows to hold state in env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx]. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next

2018-12-21T01:31:36Z

Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2018-12-21 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. There is a merge conflict in test_verifier.c. Result looks as follows: [...] }, { "calls: cross frame pruning", .insns = { [...] .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, .errstr_unpriv = "function calls to other bpf functions are allowed for root only", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr = "!read_ok", .result = REJECT, }, { "jset: functional", .insns = { [...] { "jset: unknown const compare not taken", .insns = { BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JSET, BPF_REG_0, 1, 1), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_9, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, .errstr_unpriv = "!read_ok", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .errstr = "!read_ok", .result = REJECT, }, [...] { "jset: range", .insns = { [...] }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, .result = ACCEPT, }, The main changes are: 1) Various BTF related improvements in order to get line info working. Meaning, verifier will now annotate the corresponding BPF C code to the error log, from Martin and Yonghong. 2) Implement support for raw BPF tracepoints in modules, from Matt. 3) Add several improvements to verifier state logic, namely speeding up stacksafe check, optimizations for stack state equivalence test and safety checks for liveness analysis, from Alexei. 4) Teach verifier to make use of BPF_JSET instruction, add several test cases to kselftests and remove nfp specific JSET optimization now that verifier has awareness, from Jakub. 5) Improve BPF verifier's slot_type marking logic in order to allow more stack slot sharing, from Jiong. 6) Add sk_msg->size member for context access and add set of fixes and improvements to make sock_map with kTLS usable with openssl based applications, from John. 7) Several cleanups and documentation updates in bpftool as well as auto-mount of tracefs for "bpftool prog tracelog" command, from Quentin. 8) Include sub-program tags from now on in bpf_prog_info in order to have a reliable way for user space to get all tags of the program e.g. needed for kallsyms correlation, from Song. 9) Add BTF annotations for cgroup_local_storage BPF maps and implement bpf fs pretty print support, from Roman. 10) Fix bpftool in order to allow for cross-compilation, from Ivan. 11) Update of bpftool license to GPLv2-only + BSD-2-Clause in order to be compatible with libbfd and allow for Debian packaging, from Jakub. 12) Remove an obsolete prog->aux sanitation in dump and get rid of version check for prog load, from Daniel. 13) Fix a memory leak in libbpf's line info handling, from Prashant. 14) Fix cpumap's frame alignment for build_skb() so that skb_shared_info does not get unaligned, from Jesper. 15) Fix test_progs kselftest to work with older compilers which are less smart in optimizing (and thus throwing build error), from Stanislav. 16) Cleanup and simplify AF_XDP socket teardown, from Björn. 17) Fix sk lookup in BPF kselftest's test_sock_addr with regards to netns_id argument, from Andrey. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller