linux/kernel/bpf, branch v5.0

bpf: fix sanitation rewrite in case of non-pointers

2019-03-02T05:24:08Z

Marek reported that he saw an issue with the below snippet in that timing measurements where off when loaded as unpriv while results were reasonable when loaded as privileged: [...] uint64_t a = bpf_ktime_get_ns(); uint64_t b = bpf_ktime_get_ns(); uint64_t delta = b - a; if ((int64_t)delta > 0) { [...] Turns out there is a bug where a corner case is missing in the fix d3bd7413e0ca ("bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar type from different paths"), namely fixup_bpf_calls() only checks whether aux has a non-zero alu_state, but it also needs to test for the case of BPF_ALU_NON_POINTER since in both occasions we need to skip the masking rewrite (as there is nothing to mask). Fixes: d3bd7413e0ca ("bpf: fix sanitation of alu op with pointer / scalar type from different paths") Reported-by: Marek Majkowski Reported-by: Arthur Fabre Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAJPywTJqP34cK20iLM5YmUMz9KXQOdu1-+BZrGMAGgLuBWz7fg@mail.gmail.com/T/ Acked-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: drop refcount if bpf_map_new_fd() fails in map_create()

2019-03-01T15:04:29Z

In bpf/syscall.c, map_create() first set map->usercnt to 1, a file descriptor is supposed to return to userspace. When bpf_map_new_fd() fails, drop the refcount. Fixes: bd5f5f4ecb78 ("bpf: Add BPF_MAP_GET_FD_BY_ID") Signed-off-by: Peng Sun Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: decrease usercnt if bpf_map_new_fd() fails in bpf_map_get_fd_by_id()

2019-02-26T18:08:30Z

In bpf/syscall.c, bpf_map_get_fd_by_id() use bpf_map_inc_not_zero() to increase the refcount, both map->refcnt and map->usercnt. Then, if bpf_map_new_fd() fails, should handle map->usercnt too. Fixes: bd5f5f4ecb78 ("bpf: Add BPF_MAP_GET_FD_BY_ID") Signed-off-by: Peng Sun Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf, lpm: fix lookup bug in map_delete_elem

2019-02-22T15:17:53Z

trie_delete_elem() was deleting an entry even though it was not matching if the prefixlen was correct. This patch adds a check on matchlen. Reproducer: $ sudo bpftool map create /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm type lpm_trie key 8 value 1 entries 128 name mylpm flags 1 $ sudo bpftool map update pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm key hex 10 00 00 00 aa bb cc dd value hex 01 $ sudo bpftool map dump pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm key: 10 00 00 00 aa bb cc dd value: 01 Found 1 element $ sudo bpftool map delete pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm key hex 10 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff $ echo $? 0 $ sudo bpftool map dump pinned /sys/fs/bpf/mylpm Found 0 elements A similar reproducer is added in the selftests. Without the patch: $ sudo ./tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map test_lpm_map: test_lpm_map.c:485: test_lpm_delete: Assertion `bpf_map_delete_elem(map_fd, key) == -1 && errno == ENOENT' failed. Aborted With the patch: test_lpm_map runs without errors. Fixes: e454cf595853 ("bpf: Implement map_delete_elem for BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE") Cc: Craig Gallek Signed-off-by: Alban Crequy Acked-by: Craig Gallek Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: fix lockdep false positive in stackmap

2019-02-11T15:36:24Z

Lockdep warns about false positive: [ 11.211460] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 11.211936] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0) [ 11.211985] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 141 at ../kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3592 lock_release+0x1ad/0x280 [ 11.213134] Modules linked in: [ 11.214954] RIP: 0010:lock_release+0x1ad/0x280 [ 11.223508] Call Trace: [ 11.223705] [ 11.223874] ? __local_bh_enable+0x7a/0x80 [ 11.224199] up_read+0x1c/0xa0 [ 11.224446] do_up_read+0x12/0x20 [ 11.224713] irq_work_run_list+0x43/0x70 [ 11.225030] irq_work_run+0x26/0x50 [ 11.225310] smp_irq_work_interrupt+0x57/0x1f0 [ 11.225662] irq_work_interrupt+0xf/0x20 since rw_semaphore is released in a different task vs task that locked the sema. It is expected behavior. Fix the warning with up_read_non_owner() and rwsem_release() annotation. Fixes: bae77c5eb5b2 ("bpf: enable stackmap with build_id in nmi context") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: Fix narrow load on a bpf_sock returned from sk_lookup()

2019-02-10T03:57:22Z

By adding this test to test_verifier: { "reference tracking: access sk->src_ip4 (narrow load)", .insns = { BPF_SK_LOOKUP, BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4) + 2), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_release), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = ACCEPT, }, The above test loads 2 bytes from sk->src_ip4 where sk is obtained by bpf_sk_lookup_tcp(). It hits an internal verifier error from convert_ctx_accesses(): [root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_verifier 665 665 Failed to load prog 'Invalid argument'! 0: (b7) r2 = 0 1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = r2 2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r2 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -24) = r2 4: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -32) = r2 5: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -40) = r2 6: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -48) = r2 7: (bf) r2 = r10 8: (07) r2 += -48 9: (b7) r3 = 36 10: (b7) r4 = 0 11: (b7) r5 = 0 12: (85) call bpf_sk_lookup_tcp#84 13: (bf) r6 = r0 14: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+3 R0=sock(id=1,off=0,imm=0) R6=sock(id=1,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????0000 fp-16=0000mmmm fp-24=mmmmmmmm fp-32=mmmmmmmm fp-40=mmmmmmmm fp-48=mmmmmmmm refs=1 15: (69) r2 = *(u16 *)(r0 +26) 16: (bf) r1 = r6 17: (85) call bpf_sk_release#86 18: (95) exit from 14 to 18: safe processed 20 insns (limit 131072), stack depth 48 bpf verifier is misconfigured Summary: 0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED The bpf_sock_is_valid_access() is expecting src_ip4 can be narrowly loaded (meaning load any 1 or 2 bytes of the src_ip4) by marking info->ctx_field_size. However, this marked ctx_field_size is not used. This patch fixes it. Due to the recent refactoring in test_verifier, this new test will be added to the bpf-next branch (together with the bpf_tcp_sock patchset) to avoid merge conflict. Fixes: c64b7983288e ("bpf: Add PTR_TO_SOCKET verifier type") Cc: Joe Stringer Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Acked-by: Joe Stringer Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Fix syscall's stackmap lookup potential deadlock

2019-01-31T22:18:21Z

The map_lookup_elem used to not acquiring spinlock in order to optimize the reader. It was true until commit 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation") The syscall's map_lookup_elem(stackmap) calls bpf_stackmap_copy(). bpf_stackmap_copy() may find the elem no longer needed after the copy is done. If that is the case, pcpu_freelist_push() saves this elem for reuse later. This push requires a spinlock. If a tracing bpf_prog got run in the middle of the syscall's map_lookup_elem(stackmap) and this tracing bpf_prog is calling bpf_get_stackid(stackmap) which also requires the same pcpu_freelist's spinlock, it may end up with a dead lock situation as reported by Eric Dumazet in https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1030266/ The situation is the same as the syscall's map_update_elem() which needs to acquire the pcpu_freelist's spinlock and could race with tracing bpf_prog. Hence, this patch fixes it by protecting bpf_stackmap_copy() with this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active) to prevent tracing bpf_prog from running. A later syscall's map_lookup_elem commit f1a2e44a3aec ("bpf: add queue and stack maps") also acquires a spinlock and races with tracing bpf_prog similarly. Hence, this patch is forward looking and protects the majority of the map lookups. bpf_map_offload_lookup_elem() is the exception since it is for network bpf_prog only (i.e. never called by tracing bpf_prog). Fixes: 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation") Reported-by: Eric Dumazet Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: fix lockdep false positive in percpu_freelist

2019-01-31T22:18:21Z

Lockdep warns about false positive: [ 12.492084] 00000000e6b28347 (&head->lock){+...}, at: pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.492696] but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past: [ 12.493275] (&rq->lock){-.-.} [ 12.493276] [ 12.493276] [ 12.493276] and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. [ 12.493276] [ 12.494435] [ 12.494435] other info that might help us debug this: [ 12.494979] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 12.494979] [ 12.495518] CPU0 CPU1 [ 12.495879] ---- ---- [ 12.496243] lock(&head->lock); [ 12.496502] local_irq_disable(); [ 12.496969] lock(&rq->lock); [ 12.497431] lock(&head->lock); [ 12.497890] [ 12.498104] lock(&rq->lock); [ 12.498368] [ 12.498368] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 12.498368] [ 12.498837] 1 lock held by dd/276: [ 12.499110] #0: 00000000c58cb2ee (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: trace_call_bpf+0x5e/0x240 [ 12.499747] [ 12.499747] the shortest dependencies between 2nd lock and 1st lock: [ 12.500389] -> (&rq->lock){-.-.} { [ 12.500669] IN-HARDIRQ-W at: [ 12.500934] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.501373] scheduler_tick+0x4c/0xf0 [ 12.501812] update_process_times+0x40/0x50 [ 12.502294] tick_periodic+0x27/0xb0 [ 12.502723] tick_handle_periodic+0x1f/0x60 [ 12.503203] timer_interrupt+0x11/0x20 [ 12.503651] __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x43/0x2c0 [ 12.504167] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x50 [ 12.504674] handle_irq_event+0x37/0x60 [ 12.505139] handle_level_irq+0xa7/0x120 [ 12.505601] handle_irq+0xa1/0x150 [ 12.506018] do_IRQ+0x77/0x140 [ 12.506411] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1d [ 12.506834] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x53/0x60 [ 12.507362] __setup_irq+0x481/0x730 [ 12.507789] setup_irq+0x49/0x80 [ 12.508195] hpet_time_init+0x21/0x32 [ 12.508644] x86_late_time_init+0xb/0x16 [ 12.509106] start_kernel+0x390/0x42a [ 12.509554] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.510034] IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: [ 12.510305] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.510772] try_to_wake_up+0x1c7/0x4e0 [ 12.511220] swake_up_locked+0x20/0x40 [ 12.511657] swake_up_one+0x1a/0x30 [ 12.512070] rcu_process_callbacks+0xc5/0x650 [ 12.512553] __do_softirq+0xe6/0x47b [ 12.512978] irq_exit+0xc3/0xd0 [ 12.513372] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0xa9/0x250 [ 12.513876] apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 [ 12.514343] default_idle+0x1c/0x170 [ 12.514765] do_idle+0x199/0x240 [ 12.515159] cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20 [ 12.515614] start_kernel+0x422/0x42a [ 12.516045] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.516521] INITIAL USE at: [ 12.516774] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x50 [ 12.517258] rq_attach_root+0x16/0xd0 [ 12.517685] sched_init+0x2f2/0x3eb [ 12.518096] start_kernel+0x1fb/0x42a [ 12.518525] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 12.518986] } [ 12.519132] ... key at: [] __key.71384+0x0/0x8 [ 12.519649] ... acquired at: [ 12.519892] pcpu_freelist_pop+0x7b/0xd0 [ 12.520221] bpf_get_stackid+0x1d2/0x4d0 [ 12.520563] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.520887] [ 12.521008] -> (&head->lock){+...} { [ 12.521292] HARDIRQ-ON-W at: [ 12.521539] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.521950] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.522396] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.522828] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.523296] INITIAL USE at: [ 12.523537] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.523944] pcpu_freelist_populate+0xc0/0x120 [ 12.524417] htab_map_alloc+0x405/0x500 [ 12.524835] __do_sys_bpf+0x1a3/0x1a90 [ 12.525253] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 12.525659] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 12.526167] } [ 12.526311] ... key at: [] __key.13130+0x0/0x8 [ 12.526812] ... acquired at: [ 12.527047] __lock_acquire+0x521/0x1350 [ 12.527371] lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.527680] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.527994] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.528325] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.528645] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.528970] [ 12.529092] [ 12.529092] stack backtrace: [ 12.529444] CPU: 0 PID: 276 Comm: dd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3-00018-g2fa53f892422 #475 [ 12.530043] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 [ 12.530750] Call Trace: [ 12.530948] dump_stack+0x5f/0x8b [ 12.531248] check_usage_backwards+0x10c/0x120 [ 12.531598] ? ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 [ 12.531935] ? mark_lock+0x382/0x560 [ 12.532229] mark_lock+0x382/0x560 [ 12.532496] ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x180/0x180 [ 12.532928] __lock_acquire+0x521/0x1350 [ 12.533271] ? find_get_entry+0x17f/0x2e0 [ 12.533586] ? find_get_entry+0x19c/0x2e0 [ 12.533902] ? lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.534196] lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 12.534482] ? pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.534810] _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 [ 12.535099] ? pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.535432] pcpu_freelist_push+0x2a/0x40 [ 12.535750] bpf_get_stackid+0x494/0x4d0 [ 12.536062] ___bpf_prog_run+0x8b4/0x11a0 It has been explained that is a false positive here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/7/25/756 Recap: - stackmap uses pcpu_freelist - The lock in pcpu_freelist is a percpu lock - stackmap is only used by tracing bpf_prog - A tracing bpf_prog cannot be run if another bpf_prog has already been running (ensured by the percpu bpf_prog_active counter). Eric pointed out that this lockdep splats stops other legit lockdep splats in selftests/bpf/test_progs.c. Fix this by calling local_irq_save/restore for stackmap. Another false positive had also been worked around by calling local_irq_save in commit 89ad2fa3f043 ("bpf: fix lockdep splat"). That commit added unnecessary irq_save/restore to fast path of bpf hash map. irqs are already disabled at that point, since htab is holding per bucket spin_lock with irqsave. Let's reduce overhead for htab by introducing __pcpu_freelist_push/pop function w/o irqsave and convert pcpu_freelist_push/pop to irqsave to be used elsewhere (right now only in stackmap). It stops lockdep false positive in stackmap with a bit of acceptable overhead. Fixes: 557c0c6e7df8 ("bpf: convert stackmap to pre-allocation") Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju Reported-by: Eric Dumazet Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: run bpf programs with preemption disabled

2019-01-31T22:14:55Z

Disabled preemption is necessary for proper access to per-cpu maps from BPF programs. But the sender side of socket filters didn't have preemption disabled: unix_dgram_sendmsg->sk_filter->sk_filter_trim_cap->bpf_prog_run_save_cb->BPF_PROG_RUN and a combination of af_packet with tun device didn't disable either: tpacket_snd->packet_direct_xmit->packet_pick_tx_queue->ndo_select_queue-> tun_select_queue->tun_ebpf_select_queue->bpf_prog_run_clear_cb->BPF_PROG_RUN Disable preemption before executing BPF programs (both classic and extended). Reported-by: Jann Horn Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Song Liu Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: btf: allow typedef func_proto

2019-01-30T03:15:32Z

Current implementation does not allow typedef func_proto. But it is actually allowed. -bash-4.4$ cat t.c typedef int (f) (int); f *g; -bash-4.4$ clang -O2 -g -c -target bpf t.c -Xclang -target-feature -Xclang +dwarfris -bash-4.4$ pahole -JV t.o File t.o: [1] PTR (anon) type_id=2 [2] TYPEDEF f type_id=3 [3] FUNC_PROTO (anon) return=4 args=(4 (anon)) [4] INT int size=4 bit_offset=0 nr_bits=32 encoding=SIGNED -bash-4.4$ This patch related btf verifier to allow such (typedef func_proto) patterns. Fixes: 2667a2626f4d ("bpf: btf: Add BTF_KIND_FUNC and BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO") Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov