linux/lib/kunit, branch v5.17

Merge branch 'signal-for-v5.17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace

2022-01-17T03:49:30Z

Pull signal/exit/ptrace updates from Eric Biederman: "This set of changes deletes some dead code, makes a lot of cleanups which hopefully make the code easier to follow, and fixes bugs found along the way. The end-game which I have not yet reached yet is for fatal signals that generate coredumps to be short-circuit deliverable from complete_signal, for force_siginfo_to_task not to require changing userspace configured signal delivery state, and for the ptrace stops to always happen in locations where we can guarantee on all architectures that the all of the registers are saved and available on the stack. Removal of profile_task_ext, profile_munmap, and profile_handoff_task are the big successes for dead code removal this round. A bunch of small bug fixes are included, as most of the issues reported were small enough that they would not affect bisection so I simply added the fixes and did not fold the fixes into the changes they were fixing. There was a bug that broke coredumps piped to systemd-coredump. I dropped the change that caused that bug and replaced it entirely with something much more restrained. Unfortunately that required some rebasing. Some successes after this set of changes: There are few enough calls to do_exit to audit in a reasonable amount of time. The lifetime of struct kthread now matches the lifetime of struct task, and the pointer to struct kthread is no longer stored in set_child_tid. The flag SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP is removed. The field group_exit_task is removed. Issues where task->exit_code was examined with signal->group_exit_code should been examined were fixed. There are several loosely related changes included because I am cleaning up and if I don't include them they will probably get lost. The original postings of these changes can be found at: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87a6ha4zsd.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87bl1kunjj.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87r19opkx1.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org I trimmed back the last set of changes to only the obviously correct once. Simply because there was less time for review than I had hoped" * 'signal-for-v5.17' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace: (44 commits) ptrace/m68k: Stop open coding ptrace_report_syscall ptrace: Remove unused regs argument from ptrace_report_syscall ptrace: Remove second setting of PT_SEIZED in ptrace_attach taskstats: Cleanup the use of task->exit_code exit: Use the correct exit_code in /proc//stat exit: Fix the exit_code for wait_task_zombie exit: Coredumps reach do_group_exit exit: Remove profile_handoff_task exit: Remove profile_task_exit & profile_munmap signal: clean up kernel-doc comments signal: Remove the helper signal_group_exit signal: Rename group_exit_task group_exec_task coredump: Stop setting signal->group_exit_task signal: Remove SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP signal: During coredumps set SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT in zap_process signal: Make coredump handling explicit in complete_signal signal: Have prepare_signal detect coredumps using signal->core_state signal: Have the oom killer detect coredumps using signal->core_state exit: Move force_uaccess back into do_exit exit: Guarantee make_task_dead leaks the tsk when calling do_task_exit ...

kunit: Report test parameter results as (K)TAP subtests

2021-12-13T20:36:29Z

Currently, the results for individial parameters in a parameterised test are simply output as (K)TAP diagnostic lines. As kunit_tool now supports nested subtests, report each parameter as its own subtest. For example, here's what the output now looks like: # Subtest: inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding ok 1 - 1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits ok 2 - 1969-12-31 Upper bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits ok 3 - 1970-01-01 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits ok 4 - 2038-01-19 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits ok 5 - 2038-01-19 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on ok 6 - 2106-02-07 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on ok 7 - 2106-02-07 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on ok 8 - 2174-02-25 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on ok 9 - 2174-02-25 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on ok 10 - 2242-03-16 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on ok 11 - 2242-03-16 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on ok 12 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on ok 13 - 2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit>=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit 1. 1 ns ok 14 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit>= timestamp. Extra sec bits 1. Max ns ok 15 - 2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on ok 16 - 2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on # inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding: pass:16 fail:0 skip:0 total:16 ok 1 - inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding Signed-off-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: Don't crash if no parameters are generated

2021-12-13T20:36:21Z

It's possible that a parameterised test could end up with zero parameters. At the moment, the test function will nevertheless be called with NULL as the parameter. Instead, don't try to run the test code, and just mark the test as SKIPped. Reported-by: Daniel Latypov Signed-off-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

exit: Rename complete_and_exit to kthread_complete_and_exit

2021-12-13T18:04:45Z

Update complete_and_exit to call kthread_exit instead of do_exit. Change the name to reflect this change in functionality. All of the users of complete_and_exit are causing the current kthread to exit so this change makes it clear what is happening. Move the implementation of kthread_complete_and_exit from kernel/exit.c to to kernel/kthread.c. As this function is kthread specific it makes most sense to live with the kthread functions. There are no functional change. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"

kunit: Reset suite count after running tests

2021-10-19T20:22:02Z

There are some KUnit tests (KFENCE, Thunderbolt) which, for various reasons, do not use the kunit_test_suite() macro and end up running before the KUnit executor runs its tests. This means that their results are printed separately, and they aren't included in the suite count used by the executor. This causes the executor output to be invalid TAP, however, as the suite numbers used are no-longer 1-based, and don't match the test plan. kunit_tool, therefore, prints a large number of warnings. While it'd be nice to fix the tests to run in the executor, in the meantime, reset the suite counter to 1 in __kunit_test_suites_exit. Not only does this fix the executor, it means that if there are multiple calls to __kunit_test_suites_init() across different tests, they'll each get their own numbering. kunit_tool likes this better: even if it's lacking the results for those tests which don't use the executor (due to the lack of TAP header), the output for the other tests is valid. Signed-off-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: add 'kunit.action' param to allow listing out tests

2021-10-19T20:18:50Z

Context: It's difficult to map a given .kunitconfig => set of enabled tests. Letting kunit.py figure that out would be useful. This patch: * is intended to be an implementation detail used only by kunit.py * adds a kunit.action module param with one valid non-null value, "list" * for the "list" action, it simply prints out "." * leaves the kunit.py changes to make use of this for another patch. Note: kunit.filter_glob is respected for this and all future actions. Hack: we print a TAP header (but no test plan) to allow kunit.py to use the same code to pick up KUnit output that it does for normal tests. Since this is intended to be an implementation detail, it seems fine for now. Maybe in the future we output each test as SKIPPED or the like. Go with a more generic "action" param, since it seems like we might eventually have more modes besides just running or listing tests, e.g. * perhaps a benchmark mode that reruns test cases and reports timing * perhaps a deflake mode that reruns test cases that failed * perhaps a mode where we randomize test order to try and catch hermeticity bugs like "test a only passes if run after test b" Tested: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kernel_arg=kunit.action=list --raw_output=kunit ... TAP version 14 1..1 example.example_simple_test example.example_skip_test example.example_mark_skipped_test reboot: System halted Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: fix too small allocation when using suite-only kunit.filter_glob

2021-10-19T20:18:49Z

When a user filters by a suite and not a test, e.g. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'suite_name' it hits this code const int len = strlen(filter_glob); ... parsed->suite_glob = kmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL); which fails to allocate space for the terminating NULL. Somehow, it seems like we can't easily reproduce this under UML, so the existing `parse_filter_test()` didn't catch this. Fix this by allocating `len + 1` and switch to kzalloc() just to be a bit more defensive. We're only going to run this code once per kernel boot, and it should never be very long. Also update the unit tests to be a bit more cautious. This bug showed up as a NULL pointer dereference here: > KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, (const char *)filtered.start[0][0]->name, "suite0"); `filtered.start[0][0]` was NULL, and `name` is at offset 0 in the struct, so `...->name` was also NULL. Fixes: 3b29021ddd10 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob") Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Acked-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob

2021-10-19T20:18:49Z

Commit 1d71307a6f94 ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names") introduced the ability to filter which suites we run via glob. This change extends it so we can also filter individual test cases inside of suites as well. This is quite useful when, e.g. * trying to run just the tests cases you've just added or are working on * trying to debug issues with test hermeticity Examples: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*exec*.parse*' ... ============================================================ ======== [PASSED] kunit_executor_test ======== [PASSED] parse_filter_test ============================================================ Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=lib/kunit '*.no_matching_tests' ... [ERROR] no tests run! Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: drop assumption in kunit-log-test about current suite

2021-10-19T20:18:49Z

This test assumes that the declared kunit_suite object is the exact one which is being executed, which KUnit will not guarantee [1]. Specifically, `suite->log` is not initialized until a suite object is executed. So if KUnit makes a copy of the suite and runs that instead, this test dereferences an invalid pointer and (hopefully) segfaults. N.B. since we no longer assume this, we can no longer verify that `suite->log` is *not* allocated during normal execution. An alternative to this patch that would allow us to test that would require exposing an API for the current test to get its current suite. Exposing that for one internal kunit test seems like overkill, and grants users more footguns (e.g. reusing a test case in multiple suites and changing behavior based on the suite name, dynamically modifying the setup/cleanup funcs, storing/reading stuff out of the suite->log, etc.). [1] In a subsequent patch, KUnit will allow running subsets of test cases within a suite by making a copy of the suite w/ the filtered test list. But there are other reasons KUnit might execute a copy, e.g. if it ever wants to support parallel execution of different suites, recovering from errors and restarting suites Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: fix reference count leak in kfree_at_end

2021-10-01T19:49:38Z

The reference counting issue happens in the normal path of kfree_at_end(). When kunit_alloc_and_get_resource() is invoked, the function forgets to handle the returned resource object, whose refcount increased inside, causing a refcount leak. Fix this issue by calling kunit_alloc_resource() instead of kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(). Fixed the following when applying: Shuah Khan CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis + kunit_alloc_resource(test, NULL, kfree_res_free, GFP_KERNEL, (void *)to_free); Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang Signed-off-by: Xin Tan Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan