linux/samples/seccomp, branch v4.14

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

2017-11-02T10:10:55Z

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

samples/seccomp: fix 64-bit comparison macros

2017-01-09T06:22:03Z

There were some bugs in the JNE64 and JLT64 comparision macros. This fixes them, improves comments, and cleans up the file while we are at it. Reported-by: Stephen Röttger Signed-off-by: Mathias Svensson Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: James Morris

samples/seccomp: Support programs with >256 instructions

2016-11-01T15:58:17Z

Previously, the program size was incorrectly truncated to 8 bits, resulting in broken labels in large programs. Also changes the jump resolution loop to not rely on undefined behavior (making a pointer point before the filter array). Signed-off-by: Ricky Zhou Signed-off-by: Kees Cook

samples/seccomp: Enable PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS in dropper

2016-11-01T15:58:10Z

Either CAP_SYS_ADMIN or PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS is required to enable seccomp. This allows samples/seccomp/dropper to be run without CAP_SYS_ADMIN. Signed-off-by: Ricky Zhou Signed-off-by: Kees Cook

samples/seccomp: Fix hostprogs variable

2016-11-01T15:57:42Z

In f6041c1d, a separate SAMPLES_SECCOMP option was added. This changed hostprogs-y to hostprogs-m, so adjust it. Signed-off-by: Ricky Zhou Signed-off-by: Kees Cook

samples/seccomp: Add standalone config option

2016-07-07T17:58:03Z

Add a separate Kconfig option for SAMPLES_SECCOMP. Main reason for this is that, just like other samples, it's forced to be a module. Without this, since the sample is a target only controlled by CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER, the samples will be built before include files are put in place properly. For example, from an arm64 allmodconfig built with "make -sk -j 32" (without specific target), the following happens: samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c:13:27: fatal error: linux/seccomp.h: No such file or directory samples/seccomp/bpf-helper.h:20:50: fatal error: linux/seccomp.h: No such file or directory samples/seccomp/dropper.c:20:27: fatal error: linux/seccomp.h: No such file or directory samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.c:21:27: fatal error: linux/seccomp.h: No such file or directory So, just stick to the same format as other samples. Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson Signed-off-by: Kees Cook

samples/seccomp: improve label helper

2015-02-17T22:34:55Z

Fixes a potential corruption with uninitialized stack memory in the seccomp BPF sample program. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixlet] Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Reported-by: Robert Swiecki Tested-by: Robert Swiecki Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

samples/seccomp/Makefile: do not build tests if cross-compiling for MIPS

2014-04-03T23:21:06Z

The Makefile is designed to use the host toolchain so it may be unsafe to build the tests if the kernel has been configured and built for another architecture. This fixes a build problem when the kernel has been configured and built for the MIPS architecture but the host is not MIPS (cross-compiled). The MIPS syscalls are only defined if one of the following is true: 1) _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_ABI64 2) _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_ABI32 3) _MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_NABI32 Of course, none of these make sense on a non-MIPS toolchain and the following build problem occurs when building on a non-MIPS host. linux/usr/include/linux/kexec.h:50: userspace cannot reference function or variable defined in the kernel samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.c: In function `emulator': samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.c:76:17: error: `__NR_write' undeclared (first use in this function) Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker Cc: Ralf Baechle Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

samples/seccomp: be less stupid about cross compiling

2013-02-05T09:38:49Z

The seccomp filters are currently built for the build host, not for the machine that they are going to run on, but they are also built for with the -m32 flag if the kernel is built for a 32 bit machine, both of which seems rather odd. It broke allyesconfig on my machine, which is x86-64, but building for 32 bit ARM, with this error message: In file included from /usr/include/stdio.h:28:0, from samples/seccomp/bpf-fancy.c:15: /usr/include/features.h:324:26: fatal error: bits/predefs.h: No such file or directory because there are no 32 bit libc headers installed on this machine. We should really be building all the samples for the target machine rather than the build host, but since the infrastructure for that appears to be missing right now, let's be a little bit smarter and not pass the '-m32' flag to the HOSTCC when cross- compiling. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Acked-by: Kees Cook Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: James Morris Acked-by: Will Drewry Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

samples/seccomp: fix 31 bit build on s390

2012-09-12T02:55:31Z

On s390 the flag to force 31 builds is -m31 instead of -m32 unlike on all (?) other architectures. Fixes this compile error: HOSTCC samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.o cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-m32" make[2]: *** [samples/seccomp/bpf-direct.o] Error 1 Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Acked-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: James Morris