linux/security/apparmor, branch v4.14

apparmor: fix off-by-one comparison on MAXMAPPED_SIG

2017-11-08T18:56:22Z

This came in yesterday, and I have verified our regression tests were missing this and it can cause an oops. Please apply. There is a an off-by-one comparision on sig against MAXMAPPED_SIG that can lead to a read outside the sig_map array if sig is MAXMAPPED_SIG. Fix this. Verified that the check is an out of bounds case that can cause an oops. Revised: add comparison fix to second case Fixes: cd1dbf76b23d ("apparmor: add the ability to mediate signals") Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King Signed-off-by: John Johansen Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

Merge tag 'spdx_identifiers-4.14-rc8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core

2017-11-02T17:04:46Z

Pull initial SPDX identifiers from Greg KH: "License cleanup: add SPDX license identifiers to some files Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman " * tag 'spdx_identifiers-4.14-rc8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core: License cleanup: add SPDX license identifier to uapi header files with a license License cleanup: add SPDX license identifier to uapi header files with no license License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license

2017-11-02T10:10:55Z

Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Revert "apparmor: add base infastructure for socket mediation"

2017-10-26T17:35:35Z

This reverts commit 651e28c5537abb39076d3949fb7618536f1d242e. This caused a regression: "The specific problem is that dnsmasq refuses to start on openSUSE Leap 42.2. The specific cause is that and attempt to open a PF_LOCAL socket gets EACCES. This means that networking doesn't function on a system with a 4.14-rc2 system." Sadly, the developers involved seemed to be in denial for several weeks about this, delaying the revert. This has not been a good release for the security subsystem, and this area needs to change development practices. Reported-and-bisected-by: James Bottomley Tracked-by: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: John Johansen Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Seth Arnold Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

Merge tag 'apparmor-pr-2017-09-22' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor

2017-09-23T15:33:29Z

Pull apparmor updates from John Johansen: "This is the apparmor pull request, similar to SELinux and seccomp. It's the same series that I was sent to James' security tree + one regression fix that was found after the series was sent to James and would have been sent for v4.14-rc2. Features: - in preparation for secid mapping add support for absolute root view based labels - add base infastructure for socket mediation - add mount mediation - add signal mediation minor cleanups and changes: - be defensive, ensure unconfined profiles have dfas initialized - add more debug asserts to apparmorfs - enable policy unpacking to audit different reasons for failure - cleanup conditional check for label in label_print - Redundant condition: prev_ns. in [label.c:1498] Bug Fixes: - fix regression in apparmorfs DAC access permissions - fix build failure on sparc caused by undeclared signals - fix sparse report of incorrect type assignment when freeing label proxies - fix race condition in null profile creation - Fix an error code in aafs_create() - Fix logical error in verify_header() - Fix shadowed local variable in unpack_trans_table()" * tag 'apparmor-pr-2017-09-22' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jj/linux-apparmor: apparmor: fix apparmorfs DAC access permissions apparmor: fix build failure on sparc caused by undeclared signals apparmor: fix incorrect type assignment when freeing proxies apparmor: ensure unconfined profiles have dfas initialized apparmor: fix race condition in null profile creation apparmor: move new_null_profile to after profile lookup fns() apparmor: add base infastructure for socket mediation apparmor: add more debug asserts to apparmorfs apparmor: make policy_unpack able to audit different info messages apparmor: add support for absolute root view based labels apparmor: cleanup conditional check for label in label_print apparmor: add mount mediation apparmor: add the ability to mediate signals apparmor: Redundant condition: prev_ns. in [label.c:1498] apparmor: Fix an error code in aafs_create() apparmor: Fix logical error in verify_header() apparmor: Fix shadowed local variable in unpack_trans_table()

apparmor: fix apparmorfs DAC access permissions

2017-09-22T20:20:01Z

The DAC access permissions for several apparmorfs files are wrong. .access - needs to be writable by all tasks to perform queries the others in the set only provide a read fn so should be read only. With policy namespace virtualization all apparmor needs to control the permission and visibility checks directly which means DAC access has to be allowed for all user, group, and other. BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713103 Fixes: c97204baf840b ("apparmor: rename apparmor file fns and data to indicate use") Signed-off-by: John Johansen

apparmor: fix build failure on sparc caused by undeclared signals

2017-09-22T20:00:58Z

In file included from security/apparmor/ipc.c:23:0: security/apparmor/include/sig_names.h:26:3: error: 'SIGSTKFLT' undeclared here (not in a function) [SIGSTKFLT] = 16, /* -, 16, - */ ^ security/apparmor/include/sig_names.h:26:3: error: array index in initializer not of integer type security/apparmor/include/sig_names.h:26:3: note: (near initialization for 'sig_map') security/apparmor/include/sig_names.h:51:3: error: 'SIGUNUSED' undeclared here (not in a function) [SIGUNUSED] = 34, /* -, 31, - */ ^ security/apparmor/include/sig_names.h:51:3: error: array index in initializer not of integer type security/apparmor/include/sig_names.h:51:3: note: (near initialization for 'sig_map') Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell Fixes: c6bf1adaecaa ("apparmor: add the ability to mediate signals") Signed-off-by: John Johansen

apparmor: fix incorrect type assignment when freeing proxies

2017-09-22T20:00:58Z

sparse reports poisoning the proxy->label before freeing the struct is resulting in a sparse build warning. ../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) ../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: expected struct aa_label [noderef] *label ../security/apparmor/label.c:52:30: got struct aa_label * fix with RCU_INIT_POINTER as this is one of those cases where rcu_assign_pointer() is not needed. Signed-off-by: John Johansen

apparmor: ensure unconfined profiles have dfas initialized

2017-09-22T20:00:58Z

Generally unconfined has early bailout tests and does not need the dfas initialized, however if an early bailout test is ever missed it will result in an oops. Be defensive and initialize the unconfined profile to have null dfas (no permission) so if an early bailout test is missed we fail closed (no perms granted) instead of oopsing. Signed-off-by: John Johansen

apparmor: fix race condition in null profile creation

2017-09-22T20:00:58Z

There is a race when null- profile is being created between the initial lookup/creation of the profile and lock/addition of the profile. This could result in multiple version of a profile being added to the list which need to be removed/replaced. Since these are learning profile their is no affect on mediation. Signed-off-by: John Johansen