linux/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py, branch v6.0

kunit: tool: make --kunitconfig repeatable, blindly concat

2022-07-08T17:22:02Z

It's come up a few times that it would be useful to have --kunitconfig be repeatable [1][2]. This could be done before with a bit of shell-fu, e.g. $ find fs/ -name '.kunitconfig' -exec cat {} + | \ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin or equivalently: $ cat fs/ext4/.kunitconfig fs/fat/.kunitconfig | \ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin But this can be fairly clunky to use in practice. And having explicit support in kunit.py opens the door to having more config fragments of interest, e.g. options for PCI on UML [1], UML coverage [2], variants of tests [3]. There's another argument to be made that users can just use multiple --kconfig_add's, but this gets very clunky very fast (e.g. [2]). Note: there's a big caveat here that some kconfig options might be incompatible. We try to give a clearish error message in the simple case where the same option appears multiple times with conflicting values, but more subtle ones (e.g. mutually exclusive options) will be potentially very confusing for the user. I don't know we can do better. Note 2: if you want to combine a --kunitconfig with the default, you either have to do to specify the current build_dir > --kunitconfig=.kunit --kunitconfig=additional.config or > --kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/configs/default.config --kunitconifg=additional.config each of which have their downsides (former depends on --build_dir, doesn't work if you don't have a .kunitconfig yet), etc. Example with conflicting values: > $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config --kunitconfig=lib/kunit --kunitconfig=/dev/stdin < CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=n > CONFIG_KUNIT=m > EOF > ... > kunit_kernel.ConfigError: Multiple values specified for 2 options in kunitconfig: > CONFIG_KUNIT=y > vs from /dev/stdin > CONFIG_KUNIT=m > > CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y > vs from /dev/stdin > # CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST is not set [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2022-June/357616.html [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CAFd5g45f3X3xF2vz2BkTHRqOC4uW6GZxtUUMaP5mwwbK8uNVtA@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CANpmjNOdSy6DuO6CYZ4UxhGxqhjzx4tn0sJMbRqo2xRFv9kX6Q@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: introduce --qemu_args

2022-07-08T00:00:05Z

Example usage: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64 \ --kconfig_add=CONFIG_SMP=y --qemu_args='-smp 8' Looking in the test.log, one can see > smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ... > .... node #0, CPUs: #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 > smp: Brought up 1 node, 8 CPUs This flag would allow people to make tweaks like this without having to create custom qemu_config files. For consistency with --kernel_args, we allow users to repeat this argument, e.g. you can tack on a --qemu_args='-m 2048', or you could just append it to the first string ('-smp 8 -m 2048'). Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: refactoring printing logic into kunit_printer.py

2022-07-07T23:46:25Z

Context: * kunit_kernel.py is importing kunit_parser.py just to use the print_with_timestamp() function * the parser is directly printing to stdout, which will become an issue if we ever try to run multiple kernels in parallel This patch introduces a kunit_printer.py file and migrates callers of kunit_parser.print_with_timestamp() to call kunit_printer.stdout.print_with_timestamp() instead. Future changes: If we want to support showing results for parallel runs, we could then create new Printer's that don't directly write to stdout and refactor the code to pass around these Printer objects. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: redo how we construct and mock LinuxSourceTree

2022-07-07T23:45:59Z

Our main function currently has an optional `linux` argument which is used to by our unit tests to inject a mock. We currently have the same code copy-pasted several times to do if not linux: linux = MakeRealInstance(cli_args.foo, cli_args.bar, ...) But in python, dependency injection isn't necessary or idiomatic when we can just use mock.patch() to mock things out. This change 1. adds a helper to create a LinuxSourceTree from the cli_args 2. drops the `linux` parameter in favor of mocking the __init__ func. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: misc cleanups

2022-05-16T19:22:36Z

This primarily comes from running pylint over kunit tool code and ignoring some warnings we don't care about. If we ever got a fully clean setup, we could add this to run_checks.py, but we're not there yet. Fix things like * Drop unused imports * check `is None`, not `== None` (see PEP 8) * remove redundant parens around returns * remove redundant `else` / convert `elif` to `if` where appropriate * rename make_arch_qemuconfig() param to base_kunitconfig (this is the name used in the subclass, and it's a better one) * kunit_tool_test: check the exit code for SystemExit (could be 0) Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: more descriptive metavars/--help output

2022-04-04T22:22:14Z

Before, our help output contained lines like --kconfig_add KCONFIG_ADD --qemu_config qemu_config --jobs jobs They're not very helpful. The former kind come from the automatic 'metavar' we get from argparse, the uppercase version of the flag name. The latter are where we manually specified metavar as the flag name. After: --build_dir DIR --make_options X=Y --kunitconfig PATH --kconfig_add CONFIG_X=Y --arch ARCH --cross_compile PREFIX --qemu_config FILE --jobs N --timeout SECONDS --raw_output [{all,kunit}] --json [FILE] This patch tries to make the code more clear by specifying the _type_ of input we expect, e.g. --build_dir is a DIR, --qemu_config is a FILE. I also switched it to uppercase since it looked more clearly like placeholder text that way. This patch also changes --raw_output to specify `choices` to make it more clear what the options are, and this way argparse can validate it for us, as shown by the added test case. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: properly report the used arch for --json, or '' if not known

2022-04-04T21:22:30Z

Before, kunit.py always printed "arch": "UM" in its json output, but... 1. With `kunit.py parse`, we could be parsing output from anywhere, so we can't say that. 2. Capitalizing it is probably wrong, as it's `ARCH=um` 3. Commit 87c9c1631788 ("kunit: tool: add support for QEMU") made it so kunit.py could knowingly run a different arch, yet we'd still always claim "UM". This patch addresses all of those. E.g. 1. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse .kunit/test.log --json | grep -o '"arch.*' | sort -u "arch": "", 2. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --json | ... "arch": "um", 3. $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --json --arch=x86_64 | ... "arch": "x86_64", Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: refactor how we plumb metadata into JSON

2022-04-04T21:22:23Z

When using --json, kunit.py run/exec/parse will produce results in KernelCI json format. As part of that, we include the build_dir that was used, and we (incorrectly) hardcode in the arch, etc. We'll want a way to plumb more values (as well as the correct `arch`), so this patch groups those fields into kunit_json.Metadata type. This patch should have no user visible changes. And since we only used build_dir in KunitParseRequest for json, we can now move it out of that struct and add it into KunitExecRequest, which needs it and used to get it via inheritance. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: drop unused KernelDirectoryPath var

2022-04-04T20:25:47Z

Commit be886ba90cce ("kunit: run kunit_tool from any directory") introduced this variable, but it was unused even in that commit. Since it's still unused now and callers can instead use get_kernel_root_path(), delete this var. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: make --json handling a bit clearer

2022-04-04T20:25:37Z

Currently kunit_json.get_json_result() will output the JSON-ified test output to json_path, but iff it's not "stdout". Instead, move the responsibility entirely over to the one caller. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan