linux/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py, branch v5.19

kunit: tool: misc cleanups

2022-05-16T19:22:36Z

This primarily comes from running pylint over kunit tool code and ignoring some warnings we don't care about. If we ever got a fully clean setup, we could add this to run_checks.py, but we're not there yet. Fix things like * Drop unused imports * check `is None`, not `== None` (see PEP 8) * remove redundant parens around returns * remove redundant `else` / convert `elif` to `if` where appropriate * rename make_arch_qemuconfig() param to base_kunitconfig (this is the name used in the subclass, and it's a better one) * kunit_tool_test: check the exit code for SystemExit (could be 0) Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: remove dead parse_crash_in_log() logic

2022-05-16T19:21:54Z

This logic depends on the kernel logging a message containing 'kunit test case crashed', but there is no corresponding logic to do so. This is likely a relic of the revision process KUnit initially went through when being upstreamed. Delete it given 1) it's been missing for years and likely won't get implemented 2) the parser has been moving to be a more general KTAP parser, kunit-only magic like this isn't how we'd want to implement it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: print clearer error message when there's no TAP output

2022-05-12T17:15:58Z

Before: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /dev/null ... [ERROR] Test : invalid KTAP input! After: $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /dev/null ... [ERROR] Test : could not find any KTAP output! This error message gets printed out when extract_tap_output() yielded no lines. So while it could be because of malformed KTAP output from KUnit, it could also be due to not having any KTAP output at all. Try and make the error message here more clear. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: more descriptive metavars/--help output

2022-04-04T22:22:14Z

Before, our help output contained lines like --kconfig_add KCONFIG_ADD --qemu_config qemu_config --jobs jobs They're not very helpful. The former kind come from the automatic 'metavar' we get from argparse, the uppercase version of the flag name. The latter are where we manually specified metavar as the flag name. After: --build_dir DIR --make_options X=Y --kunitconfig PATH --kconfig_add CONFIG_X=Y --arch ARCH --cross_compile PREFIX --qemu_config FILE --jobs N --timeout SECONDS --raw_output [{all,kunit}] --json [FILE] This patch tries to make the code more clear by specifying the _type_ of input we expect, e.g. --build_dir is a DIR, --qemu_config is a FILE. I also switched it to uppercase since it looked more clearly like placeholder text that way. This patch also changes --raw_output to specify `choices` to make it more clear what the options are, and this way argparse can validate it for us, as shown by the added test case. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: refactor how we plumb metadata into JSON

2022-04-04T21:22:23Z

When using --json, kunit.py run/exec/parse will produce results in KernelCI json format. As part of that, we include the build_dir that was used, and we (incorrectly) hardcode in the arch, etc. We'll want a way to plumb more values (as well as the correct `arch`), so this patch groups those fields into kunit_json.Metadata type. This patch should have no user visible changes. And since we only used build_dir in KunitParseRequest for json, we can now move it out of that struct and add it into KunitExecRequest, which needs it and used to get it via inheritance. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: simplify code since build_dir can't be None

2022-04-04T20:25:58Z

--build_dir is set to a default of '.kunit' since commit ddbd60c779b4 ("kunit: use --build_dir=.kunit as default"), but even before then it was explicitly set to ''. So outside of one unit test, there was no way for the build_dir to be ever be None, and we can simplify code by fixing the unit test and enforcing that via updated type annotations. E.g. this lets us drop `get_file_path()` since it's now exactly equivalent to os.path.join(). Note: there's some `if build_dir` checks that also fail if build_dir is explicitly set to '' that just guard against passing "O=" to make. But running `make O=` works just fine, so drop these checks. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: make --json handling a bit clearer

2022-04-04T20:25:37Z

Currently kunit_json.get_json_result() will output the JSON-ified test output to json_path, but iff it's not "stdout". Instead, move the responsibility entirely over to the one caller. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: Default --jobs to number of CPUs

2021-12-15T23:44:55Z

The --jobs parameter for kunit_tool currently defaults to 8 CPUs, regardless of the number available. For systems with significantly more (or less), this is not as efficient. Instead, default --jobs to the number of CPUs available to the process: while there are as many superstitions as to exactly what the ideal jobs:CPU ratio is, this seems sufficiently sensible to me. A new helper function to get the default number of jobs is added: get_default_jobs() -- this is used in kunit_tool_test instead of a hardcoded value, or an explicit call to len(os.sched_getaffinity()), so should be more flexible if this needs to change in the future. Signed-off-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: make `build` subcommand also reconfigure if needed

2021-12-15T18:51:16Z

If I created a kunitconfig file that was incomplete, then $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build --kunitconfig=my_kunitconfig would silently drop all the options with unmet dependencies! This is because it doesn't do the config check that `kunit.py config` does. So if I want to safely build a kernel for testing, I have to do $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build It seems unlikely that any user of kunit.py would want the current `build` semantics. So make it effectively do `kunit.py config` + `kunit.py build`. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan

kunit: tool: delete kunit_parser.TestResult type

2021-12-15T18:50:56Z

The `log` field is unused, and the `status` field is accessible via `test.status`. So it's simpler to just return the main `Test` object directly. And since we're no longer returning a namedtuple, which has no type annotations, this hopefully means typecheckers are better equipped to find any errors. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan