From 5e6a3c1ee693da1793739bb378b224bcf33d7f14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:26:39 -0700 Subject: bpf: make bpf_get_branch_snapshot() architecture-agnostic perf_snapshot_branch_stack is set up in an architecture-agnostic way, so there is no reason for BPF subsystem to keep track of which architectures do support LBR or not. E.g., it looks like ARM64 might soon get support for BRBE ([0]), which (with proper integration) should be possible to utilize using this BPF helper. perf_snapshot_branch_stack static call will point to __static_call_return0() by default, which just returns zero, which will lead to -ENOENT, as expected. So no need to guard anything here. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240125094119.2542332-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/ Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240404002640.1774210-2-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c index 6d0c95638e1b..afb232b1d7c2 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c @@ -1188,9 +1188,6 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_tracing = { BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_branch_snapshot, void *, buf, u32, size, u64, flags) { -#ifndef CONFIG_X86 - return -ENOENT; -#else static const u32 br_entry_size = sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry); u32 entry_cnt = size / br_entry_size; @@ -1203,7 +1200,6 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_get_branch_snapshot, void *, buf, u32, size, u64, flags) return -ENOENT; return entry_cnt * br_entry_size; -#endif } static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_branch_snapshot_proto = { -- cgit v1.2.3 From 314a53623cd4e62e1b88126e5ed2bc87073d90ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:26:40 -0700 Subject: bpf: inline bpf_get_branch_snapshot() helper Inline bpf_get_branch_snapshot() helper using architecture-agnostic inline BPF code which calls directly into underlying callback of perf_snapshot_branch_stack static call. This callback is set early during kernel initialization and is never updated or reset, so it's ok to fetch actual implementation using static_call_query() and call directly into it. This change eliminates a full function call and saves one LBR entry in PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY LBR mode. Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240404002640.1774210-3-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 1e03ba9ed07b..ffaa9f7f153c 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -20188,6 +20188,61 @@ patch_map_ops_generic: goto next_insn; } + /* Implement bpf_get_branch_snapshot inline. */ + if (prog->jit_requested && BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && + insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_branch_snapshot) { + /* We are dealing with the following func protos: + * u64 bpf_get_branch_snapshot(void *buf, u32 size, u64 flags); + * int perf_snapshot_branch_stack(struct perf_branch_entry *entries, u32 cnt); + */ + const u32 br_entry_size = sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry); + + /* struct perf_branch_entry is part of UAPI and is + * used as an array element, so extremely unlikely to + * ever grow or shrink + */ + BUILD_BUG_ON(br_entry_size != 24); + + /* if (unlikely(flags)) return -EINVAL */ + insn_buf[0] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_3, 0, 7); + + /* Transform size (bytes) into number of entries (cnt = size / 24). + * But to avoid expensive division instruction, we implement + * divide-by-3 through multiplication, followed by further + * division by 8 through 3-bit right shift. + * Refer to book "Hacker's Delight, 2nd ed." by Henry S. Warren, Jr., + * p. 227, chapter "Unsigned Divison by 3" for details and proofs. + * + * N / 3 <=> M * N / 2^33, where M = (2^33 + 1) / 3 = 0xaaaaaaab. + */ + insn_buf[1] = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0xaaaaaaab); + insn_buf[2] = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0); + insn_buf[3] = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_2, 36); + + /* call perf_snapshot_branch_stack implementation */ + insn_buf[4] = BPF_EMIT_CALL(static_call_query(perf_snapshot_branch_stack)); + /* if (entry_cnt == 0) return -ENOENT */ + insn_buf[5] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 4); + /* return entry_cnt * sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry) */ + insn_buf[6] = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_0, br_entry_size); + insn_buf[7] = BPF_JMP_A(3); + /* return -EINVAL; */ + insn_buf[8] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -EINVAL); + insn_buf[9] = BPF_JMP_A(1); + /* return -ENOENT; */ + insn_buf[10] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, -ENOENT); + cnt = 11; + + new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, i + delta, insn_buf, cnt); + if (!new_prog) + return -ENOMEM; + + delta += cnt - 1; + env->prog = prog = new_prog; + insn = new_prog->insnsi + i + delta; + continue; + } + /* Implement bpf_kptr_xchg inline */ if (prog->jit_requested && BITS_PER_LONG == 64 && insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_kptr_xchg && -- cgit v1.2.3