| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
In preparation for allowing both the --shallow and --path-walk options
in the 'git pack-objects' builtin, create a new 'edge_aggressive' option
in the path-walk API. This option will help walk the boundary more
thoroughly and help avoid sending extra objects during fetches and
pushes.
The only use of the 'edge_hint_aggressive' option in the revision API is
within mark_edges_uninteresting(), which is usually called before
between prepare_revision_walk() and before visiting commits with
get_revision(). In prepare_revision_walk(), the UNINTERESTING commits
are walked until a boundary is found.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
One way to significantly reduce the cost of a Git clone and later fetches is
to use a blobless partial clone and combine that with a sparse-checkout that
reduces the paths that need to be populated in the working directory. Not
only does this reduce the cost of clones and fetches, the sparse-checkout
reduces the number of objects needed to download from a promisor remote.
However, history investigations can be expensive as computing blob diffs
will trigger promisor remote requests for one object at a time. This can be
avoided by downloading the blobs needed for the given sparse-checkout using
'git backfill' and its new '--sparse' mode, at a time that the user is
willing to pay that extra cost.
Note that this is distinctly different from the '--filter=sparse:<oid>'
option, as this assumes that the partial clone has all reachable trees and
we are using client-side logic to avoid downloading blobs outside of the
sparse-checkout cone. This avoids the server-side cost of walking trees
while also achieving a similar goal. It also downloads in batches based on
similar path names, presenting a resumable download if things are
interrupted.
This augments the path-walk API to have a possibly-NULL 'pl' member that may
point to a 'struct pattern_list'. This could be more general than the
sparse-checkout definition at HEAD, but 'git backfill --sparse' is currently
the only consumer.
Be sure to test this in both cone mode and not cone mode. Cone mode has the
benefit that the path-walk can skip certain paths once they would expand
beyond the sparse-checkout. Non-cone mode can describe the included files
using both positive and negative patterns, which changes the possible return
values of path_matches_pattern_list(). Test both kinds of matches for
increased coverage.
To test this, we can create a blobless sparse clone, expand the
sparse-checkout slightly, and then run 'git backfill --sparse' to see
how much data is downloaded. The general steps are
1. git clone --filter=blob:none --sparse <url>
2. git sparse-checkout set <dir1> ... <dirN>
3. git backfill --sparse
For the Git repository with the 'builtin' directory in the
sparse-checkout, we get these results for various batch sizes:
| Batch Size | Pack Count | Pack Size | Time |
|-----------------|------------|-----------|-------|
| (Initial clone) | 3 | 110 MB | |
| 10K | 12 | 192 MB | 17.2s |
| 15K | 9 | 192 MB | 15.5s |
| 20K | 8 | 192 MB | 15.5s |
| 25K | 7 | 192 MB | 14.7s |
This case matters less because a full clone of the Git repository from
GitHub is currently at 277 MB.
Using a copy of the Linux repository with the 'kernel/' directory in the
sparse-checkout, we get these results:
| Batch Size | Pack Count | Pack Size | Time |
|-----------------|------------|-----------|------|
| (Initial clone) | 2 | 1,876 MB | |
| 10K | 11 | 2,187 MB | 46s |
| 25K | 7 | 2,188 MB | 43s |
| 50K | 5 | 2,194 MB | 44s |
| 100K | 4 | 2,194 MB | 48s |
This case is more meaningful because a full clone of the Linux
repository is currently over 6 GB, so this is a valuable way to download
a fraction of the repository and no longer need network access for all
reachable objects within the sparse-checkout.
Choosing a batch size will depend on a lot of factors, including the
user's network speed or reliability, the repository's file structure,
and how many versions there are of the file within the sparse-checkout
scope. There will not be a one-size-fits-all solution.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
When the input rev_info has UNINTERESTING starting points, we want to be
sure that the UNINTERESTING flag is passed appropriately through the
objects. To match how this is done in places such as 'git pack-objects', we
use the mark_edges_uninteresting() method.
This method has an option for using the "sparse" walk, which is similar in
spirit to the path-walk API's walk. To be sure to keep it independent, add a
new 'prune_all_uninteresting' option to the path_walk_info struct.
To check how the UNINTERSTING flag is spread through our objects, extend the
'test-tool path-walk' command to output whether or not an object has that
flag. This changes our tests significantly, including the removal of some
objects that were previously visited due to the incomplete implementation.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
The rev_info that is specified for a path-walk traversal may specify
visiting tag refs (both lightweight and annotated) and also may specify
indexed objects (blobs and trees). Update the path-walk API to walk
these objects as well.
When walking tags, we need to peel the annotated objects until reaching
a non-tag object. If we reach a commit, then we can add it to the
pending objects to make sure we visit in the commit walk portion. If we
reach a tree, then we will assume that it is a root tree. If we reach a
blob, then we have no good path name and so add it to a new list of
"tagged blobs".
When the rev_info includes the "--indexed-objects" flag, then the
pending set includes blobs and trees found in the cache entries and
cache-tree. The cache entries are usually blobs, though they could be
trees in the case of a sparse index. The cache-tree stores
previously-hashed tree objects but these are cleared out when staging
objects below those paths. We add tests that demonstrate this.
The indexed objects come with a non-NULL 'path' value in the pending
item. This allows us to prepopulate the 'path_to_lists' strmap with
lists for these paths.
The tricky thing about this walk is that we will want to combine the
indexed objects walk with the commit walk, especially in the future case
of walking objects during a command like 'git repack'.
Whenever possible, we want the objects from the index to be grouped with
similar objects in history. We don't want to miss any paths that appear
only in the index and not in the commit history.
Thus, we need to be careful to let the path stack be populated initially
with only the root tree path (and possibly tags and tagged blobs) and go
through the normal depth-first search. Afterwards, if there are other
paths that are remaining in the paths_to_lists strmap, we should then
iterate through the stack and visit those objects recursively.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
We add the ability to filter the object types in the path-walk API so
the callback function is called fewer times.
This adds the ability to ask for the commits in a list, as well. We
re-use the empty string for this set of objects because these are passed
directly to the callback function instead of being part of the
'path_stack'.
Future changes will add the ability to visit annotated tags.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
|
Add some tests based on the current behavior, doing interesting checks
for different sets of branches, ranges, and the --boundary option. This
sets a baseline for the behavior and we can extend it as new options are
introduced.
Store and output a 'batch_nr' value so we can demonstrate that the paths are
grouped together in a batch and not following some other ordering. This
allows us to test the depth-first behavior of the path-walk API. However, we
purposefully do not test the order of the objects in the batch, so the
output is compared to the expected output through a sort.
It is important to mention that the behavior of the API will change soon as
we start to handle UNINTERESTING objects differently, but these tests will
demonstrate the change in behavior.
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
|
