diff options
| author | Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> | 2021-07-13 10:58:03 -0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> | 2021-08-23 13:19:01 +0200 |
| commit | ad9a9378502d5a9da3a47666878246b9404a3391 (patch) | |
| tree | ce8bfefc86aea7de9db84027408190b38f1a8bc7 /tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/stackcollapse-report | |
| parent | c7bcbb2120cb74ce8757e310e5ceea1f3a139597 (diff) | |
| download | linux-ad9a9378502d5a9da3a47666878246b9404a3391.tar.gz linux-ad9a9378502d5a9da3a47666878246b9404a3391.zip | |
btrfs: use btrfs_next_leaf instead of btrfs_next_item when slots > nritems
After calling btrfs_search_slot is a common practice to check if the
slot found isn't bigger than number of slots in the current leaf, and if
so, search for the same key in the next leaf by calling btrfs_next_leaf,
which calls btrfs_next_old_leaf to do the job.
Calling btrfs_next_item in the same situation would end up in the same
code flow, since
* btrfs_next_item
* btrfs_next_old_item
* if slot >= nritems(curr_leaf)
btrfs_next_old_leaf
Change btrfs_verify_dev_extents and calculate_emulated_zone_size
functions to use btrfs_next_leaf in the same situation.
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/bin/stackcollapse-report')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions