diff options
| author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2024-08-07 10:24:46 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2024-08-07 10:24:46 +0100 |
| commit | e66f33bdf0c3adda068b1e2c70c768c56166b58a (patch) | |
| tree | eaa0e111b4df399b2e13eb06e8f0451546e47e40 /tools/perf/scripts/python/task-analyzer.py | |
| parent | Merge tag 'linux-can-next-for-6.12-20240806' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/... (diff) | |
| parent | tcp: rstreason: let it work finally in tcp_send_active_reset() (diff) | |
| download | linux-e66f33bdf0c3adda068b1e2c70c768c56166b58a.tar.gz linux-e66f33bdf0c3adda068b1e2c70c768c56166b58a.zip | |
Merge branch 'tcp-active-reset'
Jason Xing says:
===================
tcp: completely support active reset
This time the patch series finally covers all the cases in the active
reset logic. After this, we can know the related exact reason(s).
v4
Link:
1. revise the changelog to avoid future confusion in patch [5/7] (Eric)
2. revise the changelog of patch [6/7] like above.
3. add reviewed-by tags (Eric)
v3
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240731120955.23542-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
1. introduce TCP_DISCONNECT_WITH_DATA reason (Eric)
2. use a better name 'TCP_KEEPALIVE_TIMEOUT' (Eric)
3. add three reviewed-by tags (Eric)
v2
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240730133513.99986-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com/
1. use RFC 9293 in the comment and changelog instead of old RFC 793
2. correct the comment and changelog in patch 5
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/task-analyzer.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions