diff options
| author | Kriish Sharma <kriish.sharma2006@gmail.com> | 2025-11-12 05:56:42 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> | 2025-11-13 17:26:23 -0800 |
| commit | 992b7d5fd8a889dc77e384143ad5b4f5fe2a70de (patch) | |
| tree | 8567d14f1a4fcc3753fc6edde766985fa051e5f2 /tools/perf/scripts/python | |
| parent | 205305c028ad986d0649b8b100bab6032dcd1bb5 (diff) | |
| download | linux-992b7d5fd8a889dc77e384143ad5b4f5fe2a70de.tar.gz linux-992b7d5fd8a889dc77e384143ad5b4f5fe2a70de.zip | |
dpll: zl3073x: fix kernel-doc name and missing parameter in fw.c
Documentation build reported:
Warning: drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c:365 function parameter 'comp' not described in 'zl3073x_fw_component_flash'
Warning: drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c:365 expecting prototype for zl3073x_flash_bundle_flash(). Prototype was for zl3073x_fw_component_flash() instead
Warning: drivers/dpll/zl3073x/fw.c:365 No description found for return value of 'zl3073x_fw_component_flash'
The kernel-doc comment above `zl3073x_fw_component_flash()` used
the wrong function name (`zl3073x_flash_bundle_flash`) and omitted
the `@comp` parameter. Update the comment to correctly document
the `zl3073x_fw_component_flash()` function and its arguments.
Signed-off-by: Kriish Sharma <kriish.sharma2006@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251112055642.2597450-1-kriish.sharma2006@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions