| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Using this operand can produce invalid values. It also doesn't bring
any benefit as one can use the builder pattern to assemble a new value.
Reported-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/F3853912-2C1C-4F9B-89B0-3168689F35B3@nvidia.com/
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <20251022-nova-bitfield-v1-3-73bc0988667b@nvidia.com>
|
|
The shift is more easily expressed by the index of the lowest bit of the
field.
Reported-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/F3853912-2C1C-4F9B-89B0-3168689F35B3@nvidia.com/
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <20251022-nova-bitfield-v1-2-73bc0988667b@nvidia.com>
|
|
This condition was uselessly convoluted.
Reported-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/F3853912-2C1C-4F9B-89B0-3168689F35B3@nvidia.com/
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <20251022-nova-bitfield-v1-1-73bc0988667b@nvidia.com>
|
|
Add support for custom visibility to allow for users to control
visibility of the structure and helpers.
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Elle Rhumsaa <elle@weathered-steel.dev>
Reviewed-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
[acourbot@nvidia.com: fix long lines warnings and typo in commit message.]
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <20251016151323.1201196-5-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
|
|
Previously, bitfields were hardcoded to use u32 as the underlying
storage type. Add support for different storage types (u8, u16, u32,
u64) to the bitfield macro.
New syntax is: struct Name(<type ex., u32>) { ... }
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Elle Rhumsaa <elle@weathered-steel.dev>
Reviewed-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
[acourbot@nvidia.com: fix long lines warnings.]
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <20251016151323.1201196-4-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
|
|
new macro
Move the bitfield-specific code from the register macro into a new macro
called bitfield. This will be used to define structs with bitfields,
similar to C language.
Reviewed-by: Elle Rhumsaa <elle@weathered-steel.dev>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Edwin Peer <epeer@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Message-ID: <20251016151323.1201196-3-joelagnelf@nvidia.com>
|
