aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/ublk/test_generic_01.sh (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2025-09-20selftests: ublk: fix behavior when fio is not installedUday Shankar1-0/+4
Some ublk selftests have strange behavior when fio is not installed. While most tests behave correctly (run if they don't need fio, or skip if they need fio), the following tests have different behavior: - test_null_01, test_null_02, test_generic_01, test_generic_02, and test_generic_12 try to run fio without checking if it exists first, and fail on any failure of the fio command (including "fio command not found"). So these tests fail when they should skip. - test_stress_05 runs fio without checking if it exists first, but doesn't fail on fio command failure. This test passes, but that pass is misleading as the test doesn't do anything useful without fio installed. So this test passes when it should skip. Fix these issues by adding _have_program fio checks to the top of all of these tests. Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2025-03-22selftests: ublk: add generic_01 for verifying sequential IO orderMing Lei1-0/+44
block layer, ublk and io_uring might re-order IO in the past - plug - queue ublk io command via task work Add one test for verifying if sequential WRITE IO is dispatched in order. - null target is taken, so we can just observe io order from `tracepoint:block:block_rq_complete` which represents the dispatch order - WRITE IO is taken because READ may come from system-wide utility Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250322093218.431419-2-ming.lei@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>